ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2023
Executive pharmaceutical background, R&D investment and corporate innovation performance.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmaceutical Manufacturing in China Innovation Performance: A Dynamic QCA Analysis Based on the WSR Perspective.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the context of China's innovation-driven economy, the competitive advantage for pharmaceutical companies increasingly depends on their level of innovation. The executives, as the highest decision-makers in the company, directly influence corporate research and development (R&D) investment and innovation performance. Additionally, government subsidies, as an external factor alleviating corporate financial constraints, also impact a company's R&D investment. According to a survey by the
methodsThis study uses Chinese pharmaceutical companies listed from 2015 to 2022 as the research sample. The selected sample was processed as follows: companies with significant issues and risks of Special Treatment (ST) or *ST were excluded, companies with missing data were excluded, and companies for which executive background data could not be obtained were excluded. After these exclusions, the study obtained data for 223 listed pharmaceutical companies over 8 years. Then we constructed a three-stage regression model to test the impact of executive pharmaceutical background on R&D investment, the impact of R&D investment on corporate innovation performance, and the mediating effect of R&D investment. Considering that some scholars raised questions about it, this study simultaneously uses the Bootstrap analysis method in the SPSS PROCESS to test the mediating effect of R&D and the moderated mediating effect of government subsidies.
resultsThe empirical research results reveal that executive pharmaceutical backgrounds have a significant positive impact on corporate R&D investment. R&D investment contributes to the innovation performance of pharmaceutical companies and plays an intermediary role between executive pharmaceutical backgrounds and corporate innovation performance. Government subsidies act as a moderator in the relationship between executive pharmaceutical backgrounds and R&D investment, and they also moderate the mediating effect of executive pharmaceutical backgrounds, R&D investment, and corporate innovation performance.
conclusionsThis study provides insight from a dual perspective of internal and external factors, revealing the internal mechanism and boundary conditions influencing the innovation performance of pharmaceutical companies. In conclusion, pharmaceutical companies should employ executives with pharmaceutical backgrounds to manage the company. This will help increase the company's R&D investment, subsequently improving R&D performance and enhancing the pharmaceutical company's innovation competitiveness. This study not only expands the theories in the fields of executive characteristics, R&D investment, and corporate innovation performance but also has important policy implications for the appointment and selection of executives in pharmaceutical companies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38074834PMC10703667W4389800325What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.