ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2023
Pressure-controlled inverse ratio ventilation improves gas exchange in obese children undergoing laparoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled study.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Volume-controlled inverse ratio ventilation improves safe apnea time in obese patients during the induction of general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Restoration of Pulmonary Compliance after Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery Using a Recruitment Maneuver.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObese children undergoing laparoscopic surgery frequently experience high end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure (P
methodsEighty children undergoing laparoscopic surgery were randomly assigned to either the IRV group (I:E=1.5:1) or the control group (I:E=1:1.5). The lungs were mechanically ventilated following tracheal intubation. The children underwent pressure-controlled ventilation with an I:E ratio of 1.5:1 or 1:1.5. Respiratory mechanics, hemodynamic values, and ventilation-related side effects were recorded.
resultsThirty minutes after establishing CO
conclusionPressure-controlled IRV can reduce the incidence of hypercapnia, increasing Vt, and thereby improving CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
38074806PMC10703644W4389801128What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.