ArticleRadiology. Artificial intelligence2023
Breast Cancer Risk Assessment in the AI Era: The Importance of Model Validation in Ethnically Diverse Cohorts.
Article in Radiology. Artificial intelligence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Detection and Short-Term Breast Cancer Risk Models within and beyond Their Intended Use in Mammography Screening.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2026Article
- Generalizability of an AI-based mammogram risk score (MRS) for breast cancer among diverse populations of women.Science advances · 2026Article
- Over-detection and over-surveillance in breast screening: current status and the potential for artificial intelligence optimisation.Insights into imaging · 2025Review
- Deriving a Mammogram-Based Risk Score from Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for 5-Year Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2025Article
- Deep learning radiomics based on multimodal imaging for distinguishing benign and malignant breast tumours.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.