Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38074779›Full record

ArticleRadiology. Artificial intelligence2023

Patient Reidentification from Chest Radiographs: An Interpretable Deep Metric Learning Approach and Its Applications.

Matthew S Macpherson, Charles E Hutchinson, Carolyn Horst, Vicky Goh, Giovanni Montana

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology. Artificial intelligence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Chest Radiographs: A New Form of Identification?Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew S MacphersonFrom the Mathematics Institute (M.S.M.), Warwick Medical School (C.E.H.), Department of Statistics (G.M.), and Warwick Manufacturing Group (G.M.), University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom; Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, United Kingdom (C.E.H.); School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom (C.H., V.G.); Department of Radiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom (V.G.); and Alan Turing Institute, London, United Kingdom (G.M.).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7935-2081
Charles E HutchinsonFrom the Mathematics Institute (M.S.M.), Warwick Medical School (C.E.H.), Department of Statistics (G.M.), and Warwick Manufacturing Group (G.M.), University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom; Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, United Kingdom (C.E.H.); School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom (C.H., V.G.); Department of Radiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom (V.G.); and Alan Turing Institute, London, United Kingdom (G.M.).ORCID 0000-0003-3387-9229
Carolyn HorstFrom the Mathematics Institute (M.S.M.), Warwick Medical School (C.E.H.), Department of Statistics (G.M.), and Warwick Manufacturing Group (G.M.), University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom; Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, United Kingdom (C.E.H.); School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom (C.H., V.G.); Department of Radiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom (V.G.); and Alan Turing Institute, London, United Kingdom (G.M.).ORCID 0000-0003-2427-6610
Vicky GohFrom the Mathematics Institute (M.S.M.), Warwick Medical School (C.E.H.), Department of Statistics (G.M.), and Warwick Manufacturing Group (G.M.), University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom; Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, United Kingdom (C.E.H.); School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom (C.H., V.G.); Department of Radiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom (V.G.); and Alan Turing Institute, London, United Kingdom (G.M.).ORCID 0000-0002-2321-8091
Giovanni MontanaFrom the Mathematics Institute (M.S.M.), Warwick Medical School (C.E.H.), Department of Statistics (G.M.), and Warwick Manufacturing Group (G.M.), University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom; Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, United Kingdom (C.E.H.); School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom (C.H., V.G.); Department of Radiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom (V.G.); and Alan Turing Institute, London, United Kingdom (G.M.).ORCID 0000-0003-3942-3900
King's College London · GBUniversity of Warwick · GBUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To train an explainable deep learning model for patient reidentification in chest radiograph datasets and assess changes in model-perceived patient identity as a marker for emerging radiologic abnormalities in longitudinal image sets. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study used a set of 1 094 537 frontal chest radiographs and free-text reports from 259 152 patients obtained from six hospitals between 2006 and 2019, with validation on the public ChestX-ray14, CheXpert, and MIMIC-CXR datasets. A deep learning model was trained for patient reidentification and assessed on patient identity confirmation, retrieval of patient images from a database based on a query image, and radiologic abnormality prediction in longitudinal image sets. The representation learned was incorporated into a generative adversarial network, allowing visual explanations of the relevant features. Performance was evaluated with sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, Precision at 1, R-Precision, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for normal and abnormal prediction. Results: Patient reidentification was achieved with a mean F1 score of 0.996 ± 0.001 (2 SD) on the internal test set (26 152 patients) and F1 scores of 0.947-0.993 on the external test data. Database retrieval yielded a mean Precision at 1 score of 0.976 ± 0.005 at 299 × 299 resolution on the internal test set and Precision at 1 scores between 0.868 and 0.950 on the external datasets. Patient sex, age, weight, and other factors were identified as key model features. The model achieved an AUC of 0.73 ± 0.01 for abnormality prediction versus an AUC of 0.58 ± 0.01 for age prediction error. Conclusion: The image features used by a deep learning patient reidentification model for chest radiographs corresponded to intuitive human-interpretable characteristics, and changes in these identifying features over time may act as markers for an emerging abnormality.

Indexed as

Conventional RadiographyConvolutional Neural NetworkFeature DetectionPrincipal Component AnalysisSupervised LearningThorax

Identifiers

PMID38074779
PMCPMC10698609
OpenAlexW4386887987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.