Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38074771›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Enhancing nursing documentation in Kazakhstan: assessing utilization and standardization for improving patient care.

Bibinur Sydykova, Dariga Smailova, Zaituna Khismetova, Marzhan Brimzhanova, Zaure Baigozhina, Hengameh Hosseini, Natalya Latypova, Marina Izmailovich

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bibinur SydykovaSemey State Medical University, Semey, Kazakhstan.
Dariga SmailovaKazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Zaituna KhismetovaSemey State Medical University, Semey, Kazakhstan.
Marzhan BrimzhanovaDepartment of Health Economics and Insurance Medicine, Kazakhstan Medical University "KSPH", Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Zaure BaigozhinaAstana Medical University, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan.
Hengameh HosseiniUniversity of Scranton, Scranton, PA, United States.
Natalya LatypovaAstana Medical University, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan.
Marina IzmailovichKaraganda State Medical University, Karaganda, Kazakhstan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aim: This article stresses the importance of comprehensive nursing documentation in scientific medicine and discusses the adoption of standardized terminologies in Europe. The study also presents findings from a cross-sectional study conducted in Kazakhstan, assessing the utilization of standard operating procedures and nursing documentation in various clinical scenarios. The aim was evaluate the level of use of the form of nursing documentation and Standard Operating Procedure within the framework of reforming the Republic of Kazakhstan. Materials and methods: During the period from December 2021 to February 2022, a cross-sectional study was conducted in Kazakhstan, involving a randomly selected sample of nurses with technical and vocational education as well as those with applied/academic baccalaureate degrees in nursing. Results: In this cross-sectional study of 2,263 female nurses, 75.3% were nurse practitioners, and 44% held the highest qualification category. Awareness levels varied, with around 64.7% aware of the pilot program for care services, 65.8% aware of the deputy head position, and 73.8% familiar with the "extended practice nurse" role. Only 55.2% knew about the International Clinical Nursing Classification, and 54.5% observed changes in their nursing approach due to education. The limb edema measurement checklist was not used by the majority (88.4%) of respondents, and 68% did not utilize the antibiotic susceptibility testing checklist. Various other checklists and algorithms had limited utilization, with percentages ranging from 9.1 to 69.3%, indicating varying levels of adoption among participants. For assisting children with cerebral palsy, the "Assessment of hand use capacity according to the MACS classification system" was utilized by 9.1%, while 90.9% did not employ it. In the context of communication, 30.7% of the respondents utilized the "Algorithm of actions of a medical registrar when communicating with a patient," while 69.3% did not use it. These findings highlight variable adoption rates among participants for these medical procedures and protocols. Conclusion: In Kazakhstan, nursing documentation forms and Standard Operating Procedures face challenges and limited utilization, but their implementation has shown positive impacts on patient care and healthcare outcomes. Overcoming resistance to change, increasing awareness, and addressing resource constraints are essential for further improvement.

Indexed as

DocumentationNurse's RoleChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansKazakhstanPatient CareRandom AllocationReference Standardsadherenceattitude towards documentationnurses knowledgenursing documentationstandard operating procedure

Identifiers

PMID38074771
PMCPMC10702541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.