ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
Generating
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synthetic biology of oncolytic bacteria: Comparative microbial chassis and precise killing strategies.Toxicology reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The use of microorganisms as drug delivery systems to treat cancer has expanded recently, including FDA approval of certain viruses as oncolytics. Microorganisms have several unique benefits compared to traditional pharmacologic agents including dose independence, the ability to produce therapeutic proteins locally within the tumor, and simplicity of administration. However, current microbial delivery systems such as AAV9 and herpes virus have limited cassette sizes, minimal cancer cell selectivity, and low innate cytotoxicity. To address these issues, we sought to generate a strain of Methods: We generated Results: After 50 rounds of co-culture, the new strain infected 95 percent of GBM cells in 2 hours. GBM-infecting Shigella demonstrate a 124-fold preference for internalizing in nine different GBM cell lines compared to Normal Astrocytes (NA) controls. Additionally, we developed an in-cell western to identify GBM-infecting Shigella clones that preferentially internalize in patient samples without iterative co-culture. Finally, we demonstrate internalization into GBM cells is mediated via a factor modified by myristoylation. Discussion: In conclusion, here we present a novel bacterial platform that preferentially internalizes in brain tumor cells. This system provides numerous potential benefits over current interventions and other microbial strategies for treating brain tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.