ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
Development of a combined model incorporating clinical characteristics and magnetic resonance imaging features to enhance the predictive value of a prognostic model for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to develop non-invasive predictive tools based on clinical characteristics and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features to predict survival in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC), thereby facilitating clinical decision-making. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical and MRI data from LACC patients who underwent radical radiotherapy at our center between September 2012 and May 2020. Prognostic predictors were identified using single-factor and multifactor Cox analyses. Clinical and MRI models were established based on relevant features, and combined models were created by incorporating MRI factors into the clinical model. The predictive performance of the models was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), consistency index (C-index), and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: The study included 175 LACC patients. Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that patients with FIGO IIA-IIB stage, ECOG score 0-1, CYFRA 21-1<7.7 ng/ml, ADC ≥ 0.79 mm^2/s, and Kep ≥ 4.23 minutes had a more favorable survival prognosis. The clinical models, incorporating ECOG, FIGO staging, and CYFRA21-1, outperformed individual prognostic factors in predicting 5-year overall survival (AUC: 0.803) and 5-year progression-free survival (AUC: 0.807). The addition of MRI factors to the clinical model (AUC: 0.803 for 5-year overall survival) increased the AUC of the combined model to 0.858 (P=0.011). Similarly, the combined model demonstrated a superior predictive ability for 5-year progression-free survival, with an AUC of 0.849, compared to the clinical model (AUC: 0.807) and the MRI model (AUC: 0.673). Furthermore, the C-index of the clinical models for overall survival and progression-free survival were 0.763 and 0.800, respectively. Upon incorporating MRI factors, the C-index of the combined model increased to 0.826 for overall survival and 0.843 for progression-free survival. The DCA further supported the superior prognostic performance of the combined model. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that ECOG, FIGO staging, and CYFRA21-1 in clinical characteristics, as well as ADC and Kep values in MRI features, are independent prognostic factors for LACC patients undergoing radical radiotherapy. The combined models provide enhanced predictive ability in assessing the risk of patient mortality and disease progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.