Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38074628›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2023

Deep learning based tomosynthesis denoising: a bias investigation across different breast types.

Dominik Eckert, Julia Wicklein, Magdalena Herbst, Stephan Dwars, Ludwig Ritschl, Steffen Kappler, Sebastian Stober

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Monte Carlo methods for medical imaging research.Biomedical engineering letters · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dominik EckertSiemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim, Germany.
Julia WickleinSiemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim, Germany.
Magdalena HerbstSiemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8884-5555
Stephan DwarsSiemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim, Germany.
Ludwig RitschlSiemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim, Germany.
Steffen KapplerSiemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7223-7312
Sebastian StoberOtto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: High noise levels due to low X-ray dose are a challenge in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) reconstruction. Deep learning algorithms show promise in reducing this noise. However, these algorithms can be complex and biased toward certain patient groups if the training data are not representative. It is important to thoroughly evaluate deep learning-based denoising algorithms before they are applied in the medical field to ensure their effectiveness and fairness. In this work, we present a deep learning-based denoising algorithm and examine potential biases with respect to breast density, thickness, and noise level. Approach: We use physics-driven data augmentation to generate low-dose images from full field digital mammography and train an encoder-decoder network. The rectified linear unit (ReLU)-loss, specifically designed for mammographic denoising, is utilized as the objective function. To evaluate our algorithm for potential biases, we tested it on both clinical and simulated data generated with the virtual imaging clinical trial for regulatory evaluation pipeline. Simulated data allowed us to generate X-ray dose distributions not present in clinical data, enabling us to separate the influence of breast types and X-ray dose on the denoising performance. Results: Our results show that the denoising performance is proportional to the noise level. We found a bias toward certain breast groups on simulated data; however, on clinical data, our algorithm denoises different breast types equally well with respect to structural similarity index. Conclusions: We propose a robust deep learning-based denoising algorithm that reduces DBT projection noise levels and subject it to an extensive test that provides information about its strengths and weaknesses.

Indexed as

deep learningdenoisingmammographynoise simulationtomosynthesis

Identifiers

PMID38074628
PMCPMC10704268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.