ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2023
Sequestration of imaging studies in MIDRC: stratified sampling to balance demographic characteristics of patients in a multi-institutional data commons.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mitigating Domain Shift and Dataset Bias in Deep Learning Models for Cancer Diagnostics.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
- Ethical and Legal Concerns of Deepfake Technology in Biomedical Imaging: A Comprehensive Survey.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Sureness of classification of breast cancers as pure ductal carcinomaJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
- Generative Modeling for Interpretable Anomaly Detection in Medical Imaging: Applications in Failure Detection and Data Curation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Fraction-based Linear Extrapolation (FLEX) Method for Predicting Human Pharmacokinetic Clearance: Advanced Allometric Scaling Method and Machine Learning Approach.Pharmaceutical research · 2025Article
- Article
- MIDRC mRALE Mastermind Grand Challenge: AI to predict COVID severity on chest radiographs.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
- AI-based automated segmentation for ovarian/adnexal masses and their internal components on ultrasound imaging.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024Article
- Sequestration of imaging studies in MIDRC: stratified sampling to balance demographic characteristics of patients in a multi-institutional data commons.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023Article
- Longitudinal assessment of demographic representativeness in the Medical Imaging and Data Resource Center open data commons.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023Article
- OBIA: An Open Biomedical Imaging Archive.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: The Medical Imaging and Data Resource Center (MIDRC) is a multi-institutional effort to accelerate medical imaging machine intelligence research and create a publicly available image repository/commons as well as a sequestered commons for performance evaluation and benchmarking of algorithms. After de-identification, approximately 80% of the medical images and associated metadata become part of the open commons and 20% are sequestered from the open commons. To ensure that both commons are representative of the population available, we introduced a stratified sampling method to balance the demographic characteristics across the two datasets. Approach: Our method uses multi-dimensional stratified sampling where several demographic variables of interest are sequentially used to separate the data into individual strata, each representing a unique combination of variables. Within each resulting stratum, patients are assigned to the open or sequestered commons. This algorithm was used on an example dataset containing 5000 patients using the variables of race, age, sex at birth, ethnicity, COVID-19 status, and image modality and compared resulting demographic distributions to naïve random sampling of the dataset over 2000 independent trials. Results: Resulting prevalence of each demographic variable matched the prevalence from the input dataset within one standard deviation. Mann-Whitney U test results supported the hypothesis that sequestration by stratified sampling provided more balanced subsets than naïve randomization, except for demographic subcategories with very low prevalence. Conclusions: The developed multi-dimensional stratified sampling algorithm can partition a large dataset while maintaining balance across several variables, superior to the balance achieved from naïve randomization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.