Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38074627›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2023

Sequestration of imaging studies in MIDRC: stratified sampling to balance demographic characteristics of patients in a multi-institutional data commons.

Natalie Baughan, Heather M Whitney, Karen Drukker, Berkman Sahiner, Tingting Hu, Grace Hyun Kim, Michael McNitt-Gray, Kyle J Myers, Maryellen L Giger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Sureness of classification of breast cancers as pure ductal carcinomaJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. OBIA: An Open Biomedical Imaging Archive.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Natalie BaughanUniversity of Chicago, Department of Radiology, Chicago, Illinois, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3219-9291
Heather M WhitneyUniversity of Chicago, Department of Radiology, Chicago, Illinois, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7258-1102
Karen DrukkerUniversity of Chicago, Department of Radiology, Chicago, Illinois, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6544-3476
Berkman SahinerUS Food and Drug Administration, Bethesda, Maryland, United States.
Tingting HuUS Food and Drug Administration, Bethesda, Maryland, United States.
Grace Hyun KimUniversity of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Michael McNitt-GrayUniversity of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3004-4613
Kyle J MyersPuente Solutions, Phoenix, Arizona, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7394-4932
Maryellen L GigerUniversity of Chicago, Department of Radiology, Chicago, Illinois, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5482-9728

Funding

RADX TECH - CERES NANOSCIENCE INC NANOTRAP PARTICLE MANUFACTURING75N92020C00021 · NHLBI · CERES NANOSCIENCES, LLLP · PI DUNLAP, ROSS · 2021 to 2021
$4.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS 75N92020C00008NHLBI NIH HHS 75N92020C00021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The Medical Imaging and Data Resource Center (MIDRC) is a multi-institutional effort to accelerate medical imaging machine intelligence research and create a publicly available image repository/commons as well as a sequestered commons for performance evaluation and benchmarking of algorithms. After de-identification, approximately 80% of the medical images and associated metadata become part of the open commons and 20% are sequestered from the open commons. To ensure that both commons are representative of the population available, we introduced a stratified sampling method to balance the demographic characteristics across the two datasets. Approach: Our method uses multi-dimensional stratified sampling where several demographic variables of interest are sequentially used to separate the data into individual strata, each representing a unique combination of variables. Within each resulting stratum, patients are assigned to the open or sequestered commons. This algorithm was used on an example dataset containing 5000 patients using the variables of race, age, sex at birth, ethnicity, COVID-19 status, and image modality and compared resulting demographic distributions to naïve random sampling of the dataset over 2000 independent trials. Results: Resulting prevalence of each demographic variable matched the prevalence from the input dataset within one standard deviation. Mann-Whitney U test results supported the hypothesis that sequestration by stratified sampling provided more balanced subsets than naïve randomization, except for demographic subcategories with very low prevalence. Conclusions: The developed multi-dimensional stratified sampling algorithm can partition a large dataset while maintaining balance across several variables, superior to the balance achieved from naïve randomization.

Indexed as

algorithm performanceCOVID-19image databasemachine learningMedical Imaging and Data Resource Centersequestrationstratified sampling

Identifiers

PMID38074627
PMCPMC10704184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.