ArticleMedEdPublish (2016)2018
Healthcare Providers' Awareness and Perceptions of Competency Requirements in Central Venous Catheter Insertion.
Article in MedEdPublish (2016), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Background Studies show that medical residents do not feel comfortable and lack the skills and confidence to perform common bedside procedures. Regulatory bodies often require a set number of procedures to determine resident competence, yet medical providers' knowledge of competency guidelines are less well known. This study aimed to qualitatively assess existing practices relevant to documentation of competency in central venous catheter (CVC) insertion and explore healthcare providers' awareness and perceptions of those practices at their institutions. Methods The authors performed a qualitative study at Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs) from February to December 2014 as part of a larger project related to the dissemination of a simulation-based CVC insertion curriculum. Two authors conducted interviews with hospital staff (including attending physicians, nurses, and residents) at selected VAMCs. Recordings of interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed using a grounded theory approach and constant comparative techniques. Results Twenty-six participants were interviewed at six VAMCs. Participants reported varying perspectives regarding their institutions' policies about CVC insertion. Four major themes emerged: (1) knowledge of institutional policy; (2) competency by numbers; (3) documentation of competency; and (4) perceptions of competency measures. Participants reported concern about the reliability of these policies and measures of competence. Conclusions This study demonstrates that healthcare providers' knowledge and perceptions about institutional requirements for procedural competency vary widely. Our findings suggest the need for establishment of consistent competency policies based on evidence-based practices, and highlight the need for increased communication regarding individual institutional policies. Integration of rigorous simulation-based education, implemented consistently across institutions, can provide a reliable mechanism to train and assess procedural competence and ensure patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.