ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2023
Coevolution combined with molecular dynamics simulations provides structural and mechanistic insights into the interactions between the integrator complex subunits.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- EvoWeaver: large-scale prediction of gene functional associations from coevolutionary signals.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Computational Methods for Modeling Lipid-Mediated Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient Delivery.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Flavonoids and Organic Acids Affect Phase II Metabolism based on the Regulation of UGT1A1 Expression and Function.Current computer-aided drug design · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Finding the 3D structure of large, multi-subunit complexes is difficult, despite recent advances in cryo-EM technology, due to remaining challenges to expressing and purifying subunits. Computational approaches that predict protein-protein interactions, including Direct Coupling Analysis (DCA), represent an attractive alternative for dissecting interactions within protein complexes. However, they are readily applicable only to small proteins due to high computational complexity and a high number of false positives. To solve this problem, we proposed a modified DCA approach, a powerful tool to predict the most likely interfaces of protein complexes. Since our modified approach cannot provide structural and mechanistic details of interacting peptides, we combine it with Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations. To illustrate this novel approach, we predict interacting domains and structural details of interactions of two Integrator complex subunits, INTS9 and INTS11. Our predictions of interacting residues of INTS9/INTS11 are highly consistent with crystallographic structure. We then expand our procedure to two complexes whose structures are not well-studied: 1) The heterodimer formed by the Cleavage and Polyadenylation Specificity Factor 100-kD (CPSF100) and 73-kD (CPSF73); 2) The heterotrimer formed by INTS4/INTS9/INTS11. Experimental data supports our predictions of interactions within these two complexes, demonstrating that combining DCA and MD simulations is a powerful approach to revealing structural insights of large protein complexes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.