Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38074449›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroanatomy2023

Automated pipeline for nerve fiber selection and g-ratio calculation in optical microscopy: exploring staining protocol variations.

Bart R Thomson, Louise Françoise Martin, Paul L Schmidle, Hannah Schlierbach, Anne Schänzer, Henning Richter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroanatomy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Bart R ThomsonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Louise Françoise MartinInstitute of Laboratory Animal Science, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Paul L SchmidleDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Hannah SchlierbachInstitute of Neuropathology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Anne SchänzerInstitute of Neuropathology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Henning RichterDiagnostic Imaging Research Unit (DIRU), Clinic for Diagnostic Imaging, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DEUniversity of Zurich · CHUniversity Hospital Münster · DEUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

G-ratio is crucial for understanding the nervous system's health and function as it measures the relative myelin thickness around an axon. However, manual measurement is biased and variable, emphasizing the need for an automated and standardized technique. Although deep learning holds promise, current implementations lack clinical relevance and generalizability. This study aimed to develop an automated pipeline for selecting nerve fibers and calculating relevant g-ratio using quality parameters in optical microscopy. Histological sections from the sciatic nerves of 16 female mice were prepared and stained with either p-phenylenediamine (PPD) or toluidine blue (TB). A custom UNet model was trained on a mix of both types of staining to segment the sections based on 7,694 manually delineated nerve fibers. Post-processing excluded non-relevant nerves. Axon diameter, myelin thickness, and g-ratio were computed from the segmentation results and its reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Validation was performed on adjacent cuts of the same nerve. Then, morphometrical analyses of both staining techniques were performed. High agreement with the ground truth was shown by the model, with dice scores of 0.86 (axon) and 0.80 (myelin) and pixel-wise accuracy of 0.98 (axon) and 0.94 (myelin). Good inter-device reliability was observed with ICC at 0.87 (g-ratio) and 0.83 (myelin thickness), and an excellent ICC of 0.99 for axon diameter. Although axon diameter significantly differed from the ground truth (

Indexed as

deep learningg-ratiomiceoptical microscopysciatic nervesegmentation

Identifiers

PMID38074449
PMCPMC10702553
OpenAlexW4388941017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.