ArticleSaudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
Detection of graft failure in post-keratoplasty patients by automated deep learning.
Article in Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Utilization of an automated machine learning approach for the detection of granular corneal dystrophy via slit lamp photographs.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Ophthalmology's new horizon: Moving from reactive care to proactive artificial intelligence solutions.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDetection of graft failure of post-penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) patients from the proprietary dataset using algorithms trained in Automated Deep Learning (AutoML).
methodsThis was an observational cross-sectional study, for which AutoML algorithms were trained following the success/failure labeling strategy based on clinical notes, on a cohort corresponding to 220 images of post-keratoplasty anterior pole eyes. Once the image quality criteria were analyzed and the dataset was pseudo-anonymized, it was transferred to the Google Cloud Platform, where using the Vertex AI-AutoML API, cloud- and edge-based algorithms were trained, following expert recommendations on dataset splitting (80% training, 10% test, and 10% validation).
resultsThe metrics obtained in the cloud-based and edge-based models have been similar, but we chose to analyze the edge model as it is an exportable model, lighter and cheaper to train. The initial results of the model presented an accuracy of 95.83%, with a specificity of 91.67% and a sensitivity of 100%, obtaining an F1
conclusionInitial results indicate the possibility of training algorithms in an automated fashion for the detection of graft failure in patients who underwent PKP. These algorithms are very lightweight tools easily integrated into mobile or desktop applications, potentially allowing every corneal transplant patient to have access to the best knowledge to enable the correct and timely diagnosis and treatment of graft failure. Although the results were good, because of the relatively small dataset, it is possible the data have some tendency to overfitting. AutoML opens the possibility of working in the field of artificial intelligence by computer vision to professionals with little experience and knowledge of programming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.