Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38074296›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society

Development and deployment of a smartphone application for diagnosing trachoma: Leveraging code-free deep learning and edge artificial intelligence.

Daniel Milad, Fares Antaki, Marie-Claude Robert, Renaud Duval

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Ophthalmology's new horizon: Moving from reactive care to proactive artificial intelligence solutions.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel MiladDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Fares AntakiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Marie-Claude RobertDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Renaud DuvalDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Université de Montréal · CAHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAutomated machine learning (AutoML) allows clinicians without coding experience to build their own deep learning (DL) models. This study assesses the performance of AutoML in diagnosing trachoma from field-collected conjunctival images and compares it to expert-designed DL models.

methodsTwo ophthalmology trainees without coding experience carried out AutoML model design using a publicly available image data set of field-collected conjunctival images (1656 labeled images). We designed two binary models to differentiate trachomatous inflammation-follicular (TF) and trachomatous inflammation-intense (TI) from normal. We then integrated an Edge model into an Android application using Google Firebase to make offline diagnoses.

resultsThe AutoML models showed high diagnostic properties in the classification tasks that were comparable or better than the bespoke DL models. The TF model had an area under the precision-recall curve (AuPRC) of 0.945, sensitivity of 87%, specificity of 88%, and accuracy of 88%. The TI model had an AuPRC of 0.975, sensitivity of 95%, specificity of 92%, and accuracy of 93%. Through the Android app and using an external dataset, the AutoML model had an AuPRC of 0.875, sensitivity of 83%, specificity of 81%, and accuracy of 83%.

conclusionAutoML models created by ophthalmologists without coding experience were comparable or better than bespoke models trained on the same dataset. Using AutoML to create models and edge computing to deploy them into smartphone-based apps, our approach brings the whole spectrum of DL model design into the hands of clinicians. This approach has the potential to democratize access to artificial intelligence.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligencedeep learningpublic healthscreeningtrachoma

Identifiers

PMID38074296
PMCPMC10701146
OpenAlexW4376057017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.