Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38074286›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2023

Temporary intravascular shunts and limb salvage in civilian vascular trauma.

Ombretta Martinelli, Francesca Miceli, Simone Cuozzo, Francesco Giosuè Irace, Stefano Avenia, Immacolata Iannone, Ilaria Clementi, Paolo Sapienza, Maria Irene Bellini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ombretta MartinelliDepartment of General and Specialty Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Francesca MiceliDepartment of General and Specialty Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Simone CuozzoDepartment of General and Specialty Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Francesco Giosuè IraceDepartment of General and Specialty Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Stefano AveniaDepartment of General and Specialty Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Immacolata IannoneDepartment of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Ilaria ClementiDepartment of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Paolo SapienzaDepartment of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Maria Irene BelliniDepartment of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Temporary intravascular shunts (TIVS) may allow quick revascularization and distal reperfusion, reducing the ischemic time (IT) when an arterial injury occurs. Furthermore, TIVS temporarily restore peripheral perfusion during the treatment of concomitant life-threatening injuries or when patients require evacuation to a higher level of care. Notwithstanding, there are still disputes regarding the use of TIVS, in view of the paucity of evidence in terms of potential benefits and with regard to the anticoagulation during the procedure. The present study aimed to assess TIVS impact, safety, and timing on limb salvage in complex civilian vascular traumas. Patients and methods: Data were retrieved from the prospective database of our department, which included all patients hospitalized with a vascular injury of the extremities between January 2006 and December 2022. Patients undergoing TIVS during vascular injury management were included in group A, and those who could not postpone immediate care for TIVS insertion were included in group B (control group). Data concerning the times required for extremity revascularization or other surgical procedures such as orthopedic interventions and the time of limb ischemia were compared between the two groups. A comparison of the postoperative course between the two groups was also performed. Results: A total of 53 patients were included: group A (TIVS insertion, Conclusions: The use of TIVS minimizes revascularization time and improves limb salvage probability. A multidisciplinary approach is recommended, and correct surgical timing is key to ensure the best outcome.

Indexed as

amputationlimb salvagetraumavascular injuryvascular shunt

Identifiers

PMID38074286
PMCPMC10704159
OpenAlexW4388977010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.