ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2023
A prospective study on the effectiveness of a combination regime (Mifepristone and Misoprostol) in comparison with Misoprostol for missed abortion.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic value of serum human chorionic gonadotropin and uterine artery Doppler indices in missed abortion.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Misoprostol is widely used in the medical management of missed abortions. However, pretreatment with Mifepristone has shown to be effective but still not recommended to be used in missed abortions. Aims and Objectives: To compare the outcome of medically managed missed abortion or blighted ovum using combination regime (Mifepristone and Misoprostol) vs Misoprostol alone. Materials and Methods: It was a prospective single-centre study performed in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, HIMSR and HAHC hospital, New Delhi, over, for one year. All the patients with diagnosed missed abortions were randomized into two groups (Group A and Group B). Group A was given Mifepristone 200 mg orally followed by Misoprostol 800 microgram per vaginal. Group B was given Misoprostol 800 microgram per vaginal. All the patients were observed for 24 hours for the expulsion of products of conception following the given regime. Ethical approval was taken from the Institutional Ethical Committee. Results: Both groups were comparable in demographic characteristics. On applying Fisher's exact test, it has been observed that the odds of nonexpulsion of the product of conception, time taken in expulsion, and surgical evacuation because of excessive bleeding were significantly higher in Group B (Misoprostol) compared with Group A (Mifepristone followed by Misoprostol). The cost-effective analysis showed that the cost is higher among Misoprostol Group B compared with combination drugs of Group A (Mifepristone + Misoprostol), but this result is not significant. Conclusion: Mifepristone can be considered before Misoprostol in missed abortions. This regime might decrease the need for surgical evacuation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.