ArticleRegenerative therapy2023
Characterization of the cellular heterogeneity and bone regenerative potential of cultured human periosteal cells.
Article in Regenerative therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The favorable role of recombinant collagen peptide in periosteal cell-derived osteoregeneration.Regenerative therapy · 2026Article
- The effect of absorbable collagen suture for oral implant repair on wound healing and inflammation factors of gingival crevicular fluid.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cell-based bone regenerative therapy exhibits considerable potential in the treatment of bone defects caused by trauma, disease, and congenital anomalies. The periosteum, a fibrous membrane covering the outer surface of bone, plays a crucial role in bone formation and regeneration by sourcing osteoprogenitor cells. The remarkable osteogenic potential of periosteal cells (PCs) has led to the effective clinical implementation of PC-based regenerative therapies and tissue engineering. The abundance of progenitor cells in cultured PCs is well established; however, the heterogeneity of the cell population and its impact on bone regeneration remain uncertain. In this study, we aimed to characterize the heterogeneity of cultured PCs via single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) and to examine their osteogenic potential Methods: Human PCs cultivated using the tissue explant method were utilized in this study. scRNA-seq and real-time PCR were performed to examine the cellular heterogeneity and osteogenic capacity of the cultured PCs. Experimental bone formation by the cultured PCs was examined using the rat model of subcutaneous implantation. Results: ScRNA-seq analysis showed that the cultured PCs were categorized into three cell types (osteoprogenitor cells, mesenchymal stem cells, and fibroblasts) with specific gene expression patterns. In addition, the cellular population and osteogenic capacity differed between the central and peripheral regions in the culture dish. The PCs in the central region showed higher osteogenic potential than those in the peripheral region. Conclusions: This study revealed the diversity of the composition of the PCs and their distinct osteogenic capabilities in different regions in the culture dish. The findings may provide promising prospects for the development of more efficacious regenerative therapeutic applications using cultured PCs in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.