ArticleUrology annals
The difference between cytokeratin 20 expression in high- and low-grade urothelial bladder carcinomas: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Urology annals. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bladder cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide. Expression of cytokeratin 20 (CK 20) could be used as a biomarker in different epithelia to determine malignancy, especially in gastrointestinal, urinary tract, and Merkel cells. CK 20 could be detected in several urothelial carcinomas and was associated with bladder cancer recurrence. The study aimed to assess the utility of CK 20 expression for bladder cancer grading. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study assessing CK 20 expression in 73 bladder cancer patients who had transurethral resection of bladder tumor or cystectomy. The data were then collected and analyzed with SPSS Statistics version 20.0. Results: Fifty-six (76.7%) cases of high- and 17 (23.3%) cases of low-grade urothelial bladder cancer were examined for CK 20 expression. Positive expression was present in 57 (78.1%) samples. A significant difference ( Conclusion: The difference in the CK 20 expression was found to be statistically significant among different grades of bladder cancer but not to metastatic bladder cancer. Further, studies are required to establish CK 20 as a diagnostic tool. We suggest a combination with several markers to compare which is superior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.