ArticleAccess microbiology2023
Characteristics of
Article in Access microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A case of Chryseobacterium taklimakanense bacteremia.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Molecular phylogeny of 16S rRNA sequences from Ugba (Pentaclethra macrophylla) seeds.Access microbiology · 2026Article
- Clinical presentation and outcomes of bloodstream infection with intrinsically carbapenem-resistant non-fermenting gram-negative organisms: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Elizabethkingia spp. and Chryseobacterium spp. in Singapore, from 2012 to 2024.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Hypothesis/ Gap statement: Information about the incidence of Aim: We aimed to recognize the clinical characteristics, frequency of distribution of different Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study to identify all isolates of Results: We identified 42 non-duplicate isolates of Conclusion:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.