ArticleAccess microbiology2023
Evaluation of kit-based loop-mediated isothermal amplification (TB-LAMP) assay in the diagnosis of tubercular lymphadenitis.
Article in Access microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Low-complexity manual nucleic acid amplification tests for pulmonary tuberculosis in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Xpert MTB/XDR performance in non-sputum samples for diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis at a North Indian tertiary care center.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2026Article
- Applicability of TB-LAMP test for diagnosis of pulmonary TB among HIV-positive individuals.IJTLD open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The rapid and accurate diagnosis of tubercular lymphadenitis remains a challenging task today. The World Health Organization (WHO) endorsed the LoopAMP MTBC kit (TB-LAMP) as a replacement for sputum smear microscopy in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB). However, no prospective diagnostic accuracy study of TB-LAMP for tubercular lymphadenitis in adults has been performed yet. The current study evaluated the diagnostic performance of TB-LAMP in tubercular lymphadenitis (LNTB). Methods: In a prospective observational study conducted at a tertiary care hospital in India, 90 subjects (age >18 years) suspected of LNTB were recruited consecutively and followed up for 6 months between January 2019 and December 2020. Samples were processed for microscopy, culture, GeneXpert, histopathology and TB-LAMP. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of TB-LAMP against the composite reference standard (CRS) and culture were determined. Results: TB-LAMP showed a sensitivity of 83.78 % (95 % CI, 73.76-90.47) and a specificity of 81.25 % (95 % CI, 56.99-93.41), respectively, against the CRS. The PPV and NPV were 95.38 % (95 % CI, 87.29-98.42) and 52.00 % (95 % CI, 33.50-69.97), respectively. TB-LAMP showed a sensitivity of 88.89 % (95 % CI, 71.94-96.15) and a specificity of 36.17 % (95 % CI, 23.97-50.46), respectively, against culture. The PPV and NPV were 44.44 % (95 % CI, 32-57.62) and 85 % (95 % CI, 63.96-94.76), respectively. Conclusion: TB-LAMP can be used instead of conventional microscopy for the diagnosis of TB in lymph node specimens at primary healthcare centres. It provides rapid and cost-effective diagnosis of LNTB in resource-limited settings due to good sensitivity and NPV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.