ArticleCureus2023
Evaluation of Postoperative Pain in Response to Polydimethylsiloxane and Calcium Silicate-Based Endodontic Sealers Using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative evaluation of postoperative pain and healing following root canal obturation with calcium silicate and bioactive glass-based sealers to epoxy resin-based sealers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe main purpose of obturation is to achieve a complete three-dimensional sealing of the pulp space to create a tight seal and prevent bacterial movement and its toxins to the periapical tissues. Different approaches and sealants have been developed due to the root canal system's intricacy for ensuring tight adherence. The root canal sealants need to establish a bond between the material and root dentine in order to prevent leakage. Even though the biocompatibility and sealing abilities of the materials are prioritized in modern endodontics, some sealers incorporate therapeutic or antibacterial drugs like corticosteroids or calcium hydroxide. An endodontic sealer's cytotoxicity and antibacterial capabilities must be perfectly balanced. Due to the limited evidence in endodontic literature regarding the relationship between postoperative pain and the sealers that are used in this study, we conducted the research to explore the same.
aimThis study aimed to evaluate and compare pain in responses to polydimethylsiloxane and calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers (CS-BG). METHODOLOGY: The participants were divided into two groups, Nanoseal (Nanoseal-S™; Prevest, DenPro, USA) and Bioceramic (CeraSeal™; Mera Biomed Co., Cheongju, Korea) with 20 patients in each group. After caries excavation and access opening, the biomechanical preparations were performed in each tooth. To avoid over-instrumentation, the working length was verified after each instrument use. The standard irrigation protocol was performed. Sealers were mixed according to the manufacturer's instructions followed by obturation. The patients were asked to take medicines only if they had pain. The pain was evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) postoperatively at 24 hours, 48 hours, and a week after the root canal obturation.
resultsPain perception using Nanoseal-S™ and CeraSeal™ materials were compared at 24 hrs, 72 hrs, and seven days. Nanoseal showed statistically significant repletion at 24 hrs and seven days.
conclusionThe decreased irritation character of CS-BG for the periapical tissues explains the lesser percentage of pain during and pain immediately after root canal obturation observed in this investigation, which proves CS-BG is highly biocompatible with periapical tissue and further reduces patient anxiety during root canal obturation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.