Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38074068›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Influence of Date Ripeness on Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, and Glycemic Response in Various Saudi Arabian Date Varieties.

Abdullah M Alzahrani, Khalid Alghamdi, Abdulaziz Bagasi, Osama A Alrashed, Abdulrhman F Alqifari, Hassan Barakat, Metab Algeffari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abdullah M AlzahraniDepartment of Family Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, SAU.
Khalid AlghamdiDepartment of Family Medicine, King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital, Jeddah, SAU.
Abdulaziz BagasiDepartment of Family Medicine, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, SAU.
Osama A AlrashedDepartment of Family Medicine, King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital, Jeddah, SAU.
Abdulrhman F AlqifariDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, King Fahd Specialist Hospital, Buraydah, SAU.
Hassan BarakatDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Qassim University, Buraydah, SAU.
Metab AlgeffariDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Qassim University, Buraydah, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Dates have a special position in Middle Eastern countries, especially Saudi Arabia, and are essential to Arabic and Muslim diets. They are eaten in different forms according to their stage of maturation. In this study, we aimed to estimate the glycemic index (GI), glycemic load (GL), and glycemic response of different stages of date fruit maturation. Materials and methods This prospective clinical trial was conducted at King Abdul-Aziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Thirteen healthy participants, seven males and six females, received 50 g of glucose as reference food and 50 g of equivalent carbohydrates from three samples of Khalas dates and three samples of Barhi dates at different maturation stages (Khalal, Rutab, and Tamer). The GI, GL, and glycemic response for each type was calculated. Results The calculated means±SD of GI of the different stages of date maturation were 60.57±25.93, which raged from 53±16.49 to 71.06±32.97. The Khalal stage had the highest GI value, while the Tamer stage had a low GI value of 69.14 and 53.09, respectively. The GL ranged from 7.81 to 18.81. The Rutab stage had the highest GL, whereas the Khalal stage had the lowest GL values of 17.66±6.94 and 9.64±4.72, respectively. There was no significant difference in GI between different date maturation stages (p = 0.48). However, the GL presented a significant difference (p = 0.001) between different maturation stages. Conclusion The present study demonstrated that the stage of date maturation can affect the GI, GL, and glycemic response results. Therefore, healthcare providers and dietitians should address the lower GI and GL stages of date maturation in choosing a suitable carbohydrate source for healthy and diabetic individuals.

Indexed as

datedate maturity stagesglycemic indiceshealthy dietripeness

Identifiers

PMID38074068
PMCPMC10702250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.