ReviewCureus2023
Different Types of Management for Anastomotic Leak Post Esophagectomy.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A clinical practice review: management strategies and emerging approaches for anastomotic leakage following radical surgery for esophageal cancer.Annals of palliative medicine · 2025Review
- Analysis of the impact of minimally invasive esophagectomy on quality of life and functional prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective comparative study.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Article
- Comprehensive Umbrella Review of the Management of Esophageal Anastomotic Leaks.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Efficiency and Complications of Esophageal Stenting in the Management of Postoperative Fistulas.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Esophagectomy is a critical surgical procedure for managing various esophageal disorders, including malignancies, strictures, and reflux disease. Nonetheless, it is associated with significant postoperative complications, with anastomotic leak being a major concern. An anastomotic leak is defined as an unintended communication failure between the proximal esophageal segment and the conduit after surgery. This review explores evolving strategies for managing anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy, including factors contributing to leaks, such as patient-related, surgical, and perioperative factors. Diagnostic advancements, encompassing clinical evaluation, radiological imaging, and endoscopy, enable rapid and accurate detection, which is crucial for timely intervention. Management approaches have evolved beyond surgical revisions and now include conservative measures, antibiotics, and endoscopic therapies, particularly for high-risk surgical cases. Novel approaches, such as endoscopic stents, tissue sealants, and regenerative therapies, hold promise in revolutionizing treatment and outcomes. Prevention strategies, encompassing patient optimization, surgical techniques, and perioperative care, are key in minimizing leak occurrence. A multidisciplinary approach involving various specialists is essential for tailored treatments and optimized outcomes. In conclusion, anastomotic leaks post esophagectomy remain a significant challenge, and this review provides a comprehensive resource on evolving management strategies, from conservative measures to innovative techniques, assisting clinicians in decision-making for leak management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.