ArticleCureus2023
Conversations About Congenital Clubfoot: Investigating How Parents Share Information About a Structural Diagnosis With Their Children.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective Clubfoot is a common congenital musculoskeletal condition that is treated with manipulation and casting in the first few weeks of life, followed by bracing that extends into early childhood. While children typically do not recall treatment with Ponseti casting in infancy, childhood treatment and monitoring may result in a sense of heightened awareness. In light of this, this study explores how parents share information about clubfoot diagnosis and guide their children in understanding the importance of treatment. Methods Parents of clubfoot children aged 5-18 years were eligible to participate. Primary recruitment was done through social media via Facebook clubfoot support groups. Participants who gave consent completed an electronic survey and were invited to take part in a semi-structured interview to share additional experiences. Significant themes elicited from study interviews were analyzed along with survey responses. Results Survey responses were received from 74 parents, and 23 participated in the semi-structured interview. Of note, 91% of parents indicated discussing clubfoot with their children, beginning at a median age of three years. The age at which parents first discussed clubfoot with their child was significantly earlier for those who "strongly agree" that their children understand their condition versus those who "agree". Although 68% of parents indicated that receiving guidance from their orthopedic provider would be helpful for these discussions, only 18% noted receiving direct advice. Recurrent themes across interviews included being open and honest about the children's diagnosis and treatment, aiding the children in taking ownership of their diagnosis, and validating emotional responses throughout treatment. Conclusions This study provides valuable insights into initiating conversations with children about structural diagnoses like congenital clubfoot. Recurrent themes from conversations with families provide information on helpful strategies to encourage early discussions about clubfoot diagnosis and treatment to aid children in taking ownership of their diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.