ArticleCureus2023
The Financial Burden Associated With Conservatively Managed Epistaxis.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimEach year, approximately 25,000 patients present to NHS hospitals in the UK with epistaxis. This study aims to investigate the financial implications of epistaxis, focusing on cases managed conservatively. Specifically, the research explores the average cost of hospital bed stays, the length of hospitalization, and the impact of blood thinners on healthcare expenses. Methods: A retrospective study spanning June 2022 to June 2023 collected data from electronic health records at our local district general hospital. Patients meeting inclusion criteria were analyzed for demographic information, duration of hospital stay, use of blood thinners, and outcomes. Statistical software (SAS and Excel) was used for data analysis.
resultsOut of 126 patients, conservatively managed epistaxis cases (n = 119) had an average age of 73.9 years, with 53.6% males. The mortality rate was 4.5%. The average hospital stay was 2.92 days. Approximately 57% of patients were taking blood thinners. The average cost of a hospital bed stay for epistaxis patients was £1,712.84, with a £259.69 difference between those on blood thinners and those not.
conclusionEpistaxis imposes a significant financial burden on hospitals, with conservatively managed cases incurring substantial costs. Recognizing and addressing the financial implications of epistaxis is essential for healthcare providers and policymakers. Investment in preventative medicine and patient education can potentially reduce the incidence of epistaxis and alleviate the financial burden on healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.