Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38073894›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of psychiatry2023

Safety and effectiveness of lurasidone in the treatment of Chinese schizophrenia patients: An interim analysis of post-marketing surveillance.

Yu-Mei Wei, Xi-Jin Wang, Xiao-Dong Yang, Chuan-Sheng Wang, Li-Li Wang, Xiao-Ying Xu, Gui-Jun Zhao, Bin Li, Dao-Min Zhu, Qi Wu and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Lurasidone versus typical antipsychotics for schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Research fronts and researchers ofWorld journal of psychiatry · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yu-Mei WeiShanghai Clinical Research Center for Mental Health, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China.
Xi-Jin WangDepartment of Psychiatry, The First Psychiatric Hospital of Harbin, Harbin 150056, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Xiao-Dong YangDepartment of Psychiatry, Shandong Provincial Mental Health Center, Jinan 250014, Shandong Province, China.
Chuan-Sheng WangDepartment of Psychiatry, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang 453002, Henan Province, China.
Li-Li WangDepartment of Psychiatry, Tianjin Mental Health Center, Tianjin Anding Hospital, Tianjin 300222, China.
Xiao-Ying XuDepartment of Psychiatry, The Fifth People's Hospital of Zigong, Zigong 643020, Sichuan Province, China.
Gui-Jun ZhaoDepartment of Psychiatry, Guangyuan Mental Health Center, Guangyuan 628001, Guizhou Province, China.
Bin LiDepartment of Psychology, Fujian Energy General Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, Fujian Province, China.
Dao-Min ZhuDepartment of Sleep Disorders, Affiliated Psychological Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei Fourth People's Hospital, Anhui Mental Health Center, Hefei 230022, Anhui Province, China.
Qi WuSumitomo Pharma (China), Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200025, China.
Yi-Feng ShenShanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders, Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Mental Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China. shenyifeng@sina.com.
Tianjin Anding Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSchizophrenia is a psychiatric disorder characterized by chronic or recurrent symptoms. Lurasidone was licensed in China in 2019 for the treatment of adult schizophrenia in adults with a maximum dose of 80 mg/d. However, post-market surveillance (PMS) with an adequate sample size is required for further validation of the drug's safety profile and effectiveness.

aimTo conduct PMS in real-world clinical settings and evaluate the safety and effectiveness of lurasidone in the Chinese population.

methodsA prospective, multicenter, open-label, 12-wk surveillance was conducted in mainland China. All patients with schizophrenia from 10 sites who had begun medication with lurasidone between September 2019 and August 2022 were eligible for enrollment. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs), adverse drug reactions (ADRs), extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), akathisia, use of EPS drugs, weight gain, and laboratory values as metabolic parameters and the QTc interval. The effectiveness was assessed using the brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS) from baseline to the end of treatment.

resultsA total of 965 patients were enrolled in the full analysis set and 894 in the safety set in this interim analysis. The average daily dose was 61.7 ± 19.08 mg (mean ± SD) during the treatment. AEs and ADRs were experienced by 101 patients (11.3%) and 78 patients (8.7%), respectively, which were mostly mild. EPS occurred in 25 individuals with a 2.8% incidence, including akathisia in 20 individuals (2.2%). Moreover, 59 patients received drugs for treating EPS during the treatment, with an incidence of 6.6% which dropped to 5.4% at the end of the treatment. The average weight change was 0.20 ± 2.36 kg (

conclusionThe interim analysis of the PMS of adult patients with schizophrenia demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of lurasidone in the Chinese population. No new safety or efficacy concerns were identified.

Indexed as

ChineseEffectivenessLurasidoneSafetySchizophreniaSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID38073894
PMCPMC10701211
OpenAlexW4388779080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.