ArticlePhysical review fluids2023
Origin and evolution of immersed boundary methods in computational fluid dynamics.
Article in Physical review fluids, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This article presents the evolutionary history of Immersed Boundary Methods (IBMs), tracing their origins to the very beginning of computational fluid dynamics in the late 1950s all the way to the present day. The article highlights the advancements in this simulation methodology over the last fifty years and explores the interplay between IBMs and body-conformal grid (BCG) methods during this time. Drawing upon the author's combined experience of over forty years in this arena, the perspective offered is personal and subjective. By employing a critical and comparative approach through the chronological lens, we hope that this article empowers the reader to understand both the capabilities and limitations of these methods, and to pursue advancements that fill the key gaps and break new ground.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.