Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38073799›Full record

ArticleMedEdPublish (2016)2020

Exploring the value of the learners' perception of teaching effectiveness in informing faculty development needs: A mixed-methods study.

Farah Otaki, Amar Hassan Khamis, Reem AlGurg, Mohamed Nasaif, Dave Davis, Nabil Zary

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPublish (2016), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Farah OtakiMohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences (MBRU).
Amar Hassan KhamisMohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences (MBRU).
Reem AlGurgMohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences (MBRU).
Mohamed NasaifTraining and Development Centre.
Dave DavisMohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences (MBRU).
Nabil ZaryMohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences (MBRU).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. The evaluation of a faculty development intervention needs to start at the outset, and not as an afterthought. Moreover, it is important to evaluate the degree to which the predefined impact is attained as a result to the learning and development opportunity. This calls for the engagement of the ultimate receivers: the students, who are well-positioned to identify gaps in the teaching performance of their own instructors. Accordingly, this mixed-methods study aims at shedding light on a Continuous Quality Improvement system where feedback from undergraduate and postgraduate students is assembled to pinpoint faculty development needs, based on which professional development opportunities are devised. Data was extracted from an annual survey that evaluates the students' satisfaction. Qualitative data was thematically analysed, and quantitative data was analysed using SPSS. The qualitative analysis resulted in six categories of recommendations, that were fit into two themes: dynamic between the instructors and students, and organization and delivery of the program. As for the quantitative analysis, the students indicated opportunities for improvement in the following two areas: student academic advising process (55.17%), and communication between instructors and students (50.59%). The study concluded that there is added value in capturing and effectively assembling the learners' perception of faculty performance. It raises the reliability of the implemented evaluation framework, and has the potential of improving the rigor of faculty development initiatives.

Indexed as

Continuous Quality Improvement.Faculty DevelopmentPerformancePostgraduateStudent EngagementUndergraduate

Identifiers

PMID38073799
PMCPMC10699389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.