ArticleOncology letters2024
Efficacy and safety of apatinib plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy alone for the treatment of advanced‑stage non‑small cell lung cancer: A meta‑analysis.
Article in Oncology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Apatinib has been widely applied for the treatment of gastrointestinal cancer since its development; however, available conclusive data regarding its use in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are lacking. Thus, the present meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the use of apatinib plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy alone for the treatment of patients with advanced-stage NSCLC. Published studies reporting the treatment response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events in patients with advanced-stage NSCLC treated with apatinib plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone were searched using the PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, EMBASE, Chongqing VIP Information, Cochrane and Wanfang databases until February 2023. Finally, 18 studies involving 677 patients with NSCLC receiving apatinib plus chemotherapy and 672 patients with NSCLC receiving chemotherapy were included in the present analysis. Apatinib plus chemotherapy was found to increase the objective response rate [relative risk (RR), 1.60; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.38-1.86] and disease control rate (RR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.21-1.38) compared to chemotherapy alone. Of note, apatinib plus chemotherapy also prolonged PFS compared with chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.35-0.73), while no OS data were retrievable from the included studies. With regard to safety, apatinib plus chemotherapy elevated the risk of developing hypertension (RR, 3.78; 95% CI, 1.81-7.93) and hand-foot syndrome (RR, 6.51; 95% CI, 3.70-11.46) vs. chemotherapy alone; however, no difference was observed between the two regimens in terms of the incidence of other adverse events. Furthermore, the bias was low and the pooled findings were reliable/stable, as indicated by a sensitivity analysis. On the whole, the present study demonstrates that apatinib plus chemotherapy increases the treatment response and PFS vs. chemotherapy alone, while it also elevates the risk of developing hypertension and hand-foot syndrome in patients with advanced-stage NSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.