Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38073676›Full record

ArticleInternet interventions2023

Transforming guided internet interventions into simplified and self-guided digital tools - Experiences from three recent projects.

Martin Kraepelien, Amira Hentati, Dorian Kern, Christopher Sundström, Susanna Jernelöv, Nils Lindefors

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internet interventions, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Martin KraepelienCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Sweden.
Amira HentatiCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Sweden.
Dorian KernCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Sweden.
Christopher SundströmCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Sweden.
Susanna JernelövCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Sweden.
Nils LindeforsCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Sweden.
Stockholm Health Care Services · SEKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Therapist-guided internet interventions are often more efficacious than unguided ones. However, the guidance itself requires clinician time, and some research suggests that self-guided interventions could potentially be equally effective. The concept of digital psychological self-care, self-guided internet interventions based on the use of digital tools and provided within a structured clinical process, is presented. Methods: Three new self-care interventions, a sleep diary-based intervention for insomnia, an alcohol diary-based intervention for problematic alcohol use and an intervention with exposure and mindfulness tools for atopic dermatitis (eczema), were developed. Newly developed digital self-care interventions were compared to the earlier therapist-guided interventions they were based on, using published results from three feasibility trials (n's = 30, 36 and 21) and three randomized trials (n's = 148, 166 and 102). The comparison included type of content, duration, length of written material and within-group effect-sizes. Results: In comparison to the guided interventions, clinician time was greatly reduced and the new interventions involved much less reading for participants. The digital self-care tools also showed within-group effect sizes and response rates on par with the more comprehensive guided internet interventions. Discussion: Preliminary results suggest that some guided internet interventions can be transformed into self-guided digital tools. These three examples show that digital psychological self-care, if provided with telephone interviews before and after the intervention, can be viable alternatives to more comprehensive guided internet interventions. Although these examples are promising, further studies, including randomized experiments, are needed to compare treatment efficacies, and to identify which groups of patients may need more comprehensive guided internet interventions.

Indexed as

Digital self-careDigital toolsISRIIPittsburghSelf-guidedStepped care

Identifiers

PMID38073676
PMCPMC10709100
OpenAlexW4388948656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.