Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38073628›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2023

Bibliometric and visual analysis of spinal cord injury-associated macrophages from 2002 to 2023.

Yan Zhao, Qiuqiu Xia, Hui Zong, Yanyang Wang, Huaize Dong, Lu Zhu, Jiyue Xia, Qiming Mao, Zijing Weng, Wenbo Liao and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yan ZhaoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou, China.
Qiuqiu XiaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou, China.
Hui ZongInstitutes for Systems Genetics, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-Related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yanyang WangDepartment of Cell Engineering Laboratory, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China.
Huaize DongDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou, China.
Lu ZhuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou, China.
Jiyue XiaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou, China.
Qiming MaoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou, China.
Zijing WengDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou, China.
Wenbo LiaoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou, China.
Zhijun XinDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Spinal cord injury (SCI) triggers motor, sensory, and autonomic impairments that adversely damage patients' quality of life. Its pathophysiological processes include inflammation, oxidative stress, and apoptosis, although existing treatment options have little success. Macrophages have a vital function in controlling inflammation in SCI, with their M1-type and M2-type macrophages dominating early inflammatory effects and late brain tissue repair and regeneration, respectively. However, there is a dearth of rigorous bibliometric study in this sector to explore its dynamics and trends. This study intends to examine the current status and trends of macrophage usage in SCI using bibliometric methodologies, which may drive novel therapeutic options. Methods: In this study, the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) was utilized to collect publications and reviews on macrophages in SCI from 2002 to 2023. Bibliometrics and visualization analyses were performed by VOSviewer, CiteSpace, the R package "bibliometrix", and online analytic platforms. These analyses covered a variety of aspects, including countries and institutions, authors and co-cited authors, journals and co-cited journals, subject categories, co-cited references, and keyword co-occurrences, in order to provide insights into the research trends and hotspots in this field. Results: 1,775 papers were included in the study, comprising 1,528 articles and 247 reviews. Our research analysis demonstrates that the number of relevant studies in this sector is expanding, specifically the number of publications in the United States and China has risen dramatically. However, there are fewer collaborations between institutions in different nations, and international cooperation needs to be reinforced. Among them, Popovich PG became the leader in the field, and significant journals include Experimental Neurology, Journal of Neurotrauma, and Journal of Neuroscience. Research hotspots involve macrophage polarization, microglia, astrocytes, signaling, cytokines, inflammation, and neuroprotection. Conclusions: This analysis gives, for the first time, a comprehensive overview of bibliometric studies on macrophages in SCI over the past 20 years. This study not only gives an extensive picture of the knowledge structure but also indicates trends in the subject. The systematic summarization gives a complete and intuitive understanding of the link between spinal cord damage and macrophages and provides a great reference for future related studies.

Indexed as

bibliometricsCiteSpacemacrophagesspinal cord injuryVOSviewer

Identifiers

PMID38073628
PMCPMC10703361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.