Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38073558›Full record

ArticleInfection control and hospital epidemiology2024

Implementation of a diagnostic stewardship intervention to improve blood-culture utilization in 2 surgical ICUs: Time for a blood-culture change.

Jessica L Seidelman, Rebekah Moehring, Erin Gettler, Jay Krishnan, Lynn McGugan, Rachel Jordan, Margaret Murphy, Heather Pena, Christopher R Polage, Diana Alame and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica L SeidelmanDuke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-7117-513X
Rebekah MoehringDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-7741-6029
Erin GettlerDuke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-1071-9898
Jay KrishnanDuke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0009-0008-6791-4671
Lynn McGuganDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0009-0002-4535-7604
Rachel JordanDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Margaret MurphyDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Heather PenaDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Christopher R PolageDepartment of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-1433-6886
Diana AlameDepartment of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Sarah LewisDuke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention Durham, North Carolina.
Becky SmithDuke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention Durham, North Carolina.
Deverick AndersonDuke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-6882-5496
Nitin MehdirattaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Anesthesia Critical Care and GVT, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Duke University · USDuke Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe compared the number of blood-culture events before and after the introduction of a blood-culture algorithm and provider feedback. Secondary objectives were the comparison of blood-culture positivity and negative safety signals before and after the intervention.

designProspective cohort design.

settingTwo surgical intensive care units (ICUs): general and trauma surgery and cardiothoracic surgery. PATIENTS: Patients aged ≥18 years and admitted to the ICU at the time of the blood-culture event.

methodsWe used an interrupted time series to compare rates of blood-culture events (ie, blood-culture events per 1,000 patient days) before and after the algorithm implementation with weekly provider feedback.

resultsThe blood-culture event rate decreased from 100 to 55 blood-culture events per 1,000 patient days in the general surgery and trauma ICU (72% reduction; incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32-0.46;

conclusionsWe implemented a blood-culture algorithm with data feedback in 2 surgical ICUs, and we observed significant decreases in the rates of blood-culture events without an increase in negative safety signals, including ICU length of stay, mortality, antibiotic use, or readmissions.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsIntensive Care UnitsAdolescentAdultHospitalizationHumansLength of StayProspective StudiesAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID38073558
PMCPMC11007355
OpenAlexW4389565362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.