Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38073376›Full record

ArticleCancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers2025

Assessing the clinical utility of biomarkers using the intervention probability curve (IPC).

Rafael Paez, Dianna J Rowe, Stephen A Deppen, Eric L Grogan, Alexander Kaizer, Darryl J Bornhop, Amanda K Kussrow, Anna E Barón, Fabien Maldonado, Michael N Kammer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rafael PaezDepartment of Medicine, Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Dianna J RoweDepartment of Medicine, Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Stephen A DeppenMultidisciplinary Approach to Stratification of Lung Cancer with Biomarkers, MASLAB, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Eric L GroganMultidisciplinary Approach to Stratification of Lung Cancer with Biomarkers, MASLAB, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Alexander KaizerDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Darryl J BornhopDepartment of Chemistry, and The Vanderbilt Institute of Chemical Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Amanda K KussrowDepartment of Chemistry, and The Vanderbilt Institute of Chemical Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Anna E BarónDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Fabien MaldonadoDepartment of Medicine, Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Michael N KammerDepartment of Medicine, Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USColorado School of Public Health · USVanderbilt University · USVA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System · US

Funding

Tissue Bank and Biomarkers CoreP50CA058187 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI MILLER, YORK E · 1992 to 2018
$43.8M
Validation of Biomarkers of Risk for the Early Detection of Lung CancerU01CA152662 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DEPPEN, STEPHEN, GROGAN, ERIC L · 2010 to 2025
$12.8M
Clinical Utility of Biomarkers Driven Management of Indeterminate Pulmonary NodulesR01CA252964 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Eric L Grogan, Alexander Mark Kaizer · 2021 to 2026
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058187NCI NIH HHS R01 CA252964NCI NIH HHS U01 CA152662
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUNDAssessing the clinical utility of biomarkers is a critical step before clinical implementation. The reclassification of patients across clinically relevant subgroups is considered one of the best methods to estimate clinical utility. However, there are important limitations with this methodology. We recently proposed the intervention probability curve (IPC) which models the likelihood that a provider will choose an intervention as a continuous function of the probability, or risk, of disease.OBJECTIVETo assess the potential impact of a new biomarker for lung cancer using the IPC.METHODSThe IPC derived from the National Lung Screening Trial was used to assess the potential clinical utility of a biomarker for suspected lung cancer. The summary statistics of the change in likelihood of intervention over the population can be interpreted as the expected clinical impact of the added biomarker.RESULTSThe IPC analysis of the novel biomarker estimated that 8% of the benign nodules could avoid an invasive procedure while the cancer nodules would largely remain unchanged (0.1%). We showed the benefits of this approach compared to traditional reclassification methods based on thresholds.CONCLUSIONSThe IPC methodology can be a valuable tool for assessing biomarkers prior to clinical implementation.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorLung NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansProbabilityBiomarkers, TumorBiomarkersclinical utilityindeterminate pulmonary noduleIntervention Probability Curvenet reclassification index

Identifiers

PMID38073376
PMCPMC11055936
OpenAlexW4389400657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.