ArticleDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)2024
Influence of image preprocessing on the segmentation-based reproducibility of radiomic features:
Article in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Image Quality Standardization in Radiomics: A Systematic Review of Artifacts, Variability, and Feature Stability.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Zero-shot segmentation and tumor diameter measurement of soft tissue sarcomas on MRI using a multimodal large language model.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- Radiomics and machine learning for differentiating pediatric intramedullary spinal tumors: a pilot study.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging-based radiomics for differentiation of skull base osteomyelitis from locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multi-center external validation study.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2026Article
- Letter to the Editor: comments on the diagnostic value of ADC texture analysis in PI-RADS 5 lesions.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2026Article
- Influence of image preprocessing on reproducibility and longitudinal repeatability analysis of radiomics features in magnetic resonance image-guided accelerator imaging.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Diagnostic value of whole-tumor ADC histogram parameters combined with ISUP grade and MRI-EPE score for predicting extracapsular extension in PI-RADS 4-5 prostate cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Multiclass machine learning models for molecular subtype identification of pediatric low-grade glioma using bi-institutional MRIs for precision medicine.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Radiomic analysis of the deltoid and scapula: identification of computed tomography-image based measurements predictive of pain, motion, and function before and after shoulder arthroplasty.JSES international · 2025Article
- Radiomics-based kidney lesion classification: Mitigating batch effect with nested combat harmonization.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Enhancing MRI radiomics feature reproducibility and classification performance in Parkinson's disease: a harmonization approach to gray-level discretization variability.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Cortical microstructural changes in schizophrenia spectrum disorders using quantitative T1 mapping.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Radiomics in radiology: What the radiologist needs to know about technical aspects and clinical impact.La Radiologia medica · 2024Review
- Impact of Preprocessing Parameters in Medical Imaging-Based Radiomic Studies: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo systematically investigate the impact of image preprocessing parameters on the segmentation-based reproducibility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomic features.
methodsThe MRI scans of 50 patients were included from the multi-institutional Brain Tumor Segmentation 2021 public glioma dataset. Whole tumor volumes were manually segmented by two independent readers, with the participation of eight readers. Radiomic features were extracted from two sequences: T2-weighted (T2) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1ce). Two methods were considered for discretization: bin count (i.e., relative discretization) and bin width (i.e., absolute discretization). Ten discretization (five for each method) and five resampling parameters were varied while other parameters were fixed. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for reliability analysis based on two commonly used cut-off values (0.75 and 0.90).
resultsImage preprocessing parameters had a significant impact on the segmentation-based reproducibility of radiomic features. The bin width method yielded more reproducible features than the bin count method. In discretization experiments using the bin width on both sequences, according to the ICC cut-off values of 0.75 and 0.90, the rate of reproducible features ranged from 70% to 84% and from 35% to 57%, respectively, with an increasing percentage trend as parameter values decreased (from 84 to 5 for T2; 100 to 6 for T1ce). In the resampling experiments, these ranged from 53% to 74% and from 10% to 20%, respectively, with an increasing percentage trend from lower to higher parameter values (physical voxel size; from 1 x 1 x 1 to 2 x 2 x 2 mm
conclusionThe segmentation-based reproducibility of radiomic features appears to be substantially influenced by discretization and resampling parameters. Our findings indicate that the bin width method should be used for discretization and lower bin width and higher resampling values should be used to allow more reproducible features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.