Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38073244›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)2024

Influence of image preprocessing on the segmentation-based reproducibility of radiomic features:

Burak Koçak, Sabahattin Yüzkan, Samet Mutlu, Mehmet Karagülle, Ahmet Kala, Mehmet Kadıoğlu, Sıla Solak, Şeyma Sunman, Zişan Hayriye Temiz, Ali Kürşad Ganiyusufoğlu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Burak KoçakUniversity of Health Sciences, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Clinic of Radiology, İstanbul, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0002-7307-396X
Sabahattin YüzkanUniversity of Health Sciences, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Clinic of Radiology, İstanbul, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0002-3066-1737
Samet MutluUniversity of Health Sciences, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Clinic of Radiology, İstanbul, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0001-6867-2872
Mehmet KaragülleUniversity of Health Sciences, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Clinic of Radiology, İstanbul, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0002-1631-8975
Ahmet KalaUniversity of Health Sciences, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Clinic of Radiology, İstanbul, TürkiyeORCID 0009-0001-7577-9659
Mehmet KadıoğluUniversity of Health Sciences, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Clinic of Radiology, İstanbul, TürkiyeORCID 0009-0009-5359-9882
Sıla SolakUniversity of Health Sciences, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Clinic of Radiology, İstanbul, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0002-1346-159X
Şeyma SunmanUniversity of Health Sciences, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Clinic of Radiology, İstanbul, Türkiye
Zişan Hayriye TemizUniversity of Health Sciences, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Clinic of Radiology, İstanbul, TürkiyeORCID 0009-0005-9335-088X
Ali Kürşad GaniyusufoğluUniversity of Health Sciences, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Clinic of Radiology, İstanbul, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0001-8749-0900

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo systematically investigate the impact of image preprocessing parameters on the segmentation-based reproducibility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomic features.

methodsThe MRI scans of 50 patients were included from the multi-institutional Brain Tumor Segmentation 2021 public glioma dataset. Whole tumor volumes were manually segmented by two independent readers, with the participation of eight readers. Radiomic features were extracted from two sequences: T2-weighted (T2) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1ce). Two methods were considered for discretization: bin count (i.e., relative discretization) and bin width (i.e., absolute discretization). Ten discretization (five for each method) and five resampling parameters were varied while other parameters were fixed. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for reliability analysis based on two commonly used cut-off values (0.75 and 0.90).

resultsImage preprocessing parameters had a significant impact on the segmentation-based reproducibility of radiomic features. The bin width method yielded more reproducible features than the bin count method. In discretization experiments using the bin width on both sequences, according to the ICC cut-off values of 0.75 and 0.90, the rate of reproducible features ranged from 70% to 84% and from 35% to 57%, respectively, with an increasing percentage trend as parameter values decreased (from 84 to 5 for T2; 100 to 6 for T1ce). In the resampling experiments, these ranged from 53% to 74% and from 10% to 20%, respectively, with an increasing percentage trend from lower to higher parameter values (physical voxel size; from 1 x 1 x 1 to 2 x 2 x 2 mm

conclusionThe segmentation-based reproducibility of radiomic features appears to be substantially influenced by discretization and resampling parameters. Our findings indicate that the bin width method should be used for discretization and lower bin width and higher resampling values should be used to allow more reproducible features.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiomicsReproducibility of ResultsbiomarkerpreprocessingradiomicsReproducibilitytexture analysis

Identifiers

PMID38073244
PMCPMC11095065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.