ArticleBiophysical journal2024
What determines sub-diffusive behavior in crowded protein solutions?
Article in Biophysical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neutron Reflectometry Reveals Diffusion in Contrast-Matched Brush Particle Bilayers.ACS macro letters · 2026Article
- Protein codes and mobility together shape cellular function and disease.Trends in biochemical sciences · 2026Review
- Molecular Modeling and Molecular Dynamics Simulation of a Packed and Intact Bacterial Microcompartment.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025Article
- Coherent X-rays reveal anomalous molecular diffusion and cage effects in crowded protein solutions.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Self-Diffusion in Two-Dimensional Colloidal Systems: A Computer Simulation Study.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Single-molecule capture, release, and dynamical manipulation via reversible electrokinetic confinement (RECON).Science advances · 2025Article
- Recent Progress in Modeling and Simulation of Biomolecular Crowding and Condensation Inside Cells.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aqueous environment inside cells is densely packed. A typical cell has a macromolecular concentration in the range 90-450 g/L, with 5%-40% of its volume being occupied by macromolecules, resulting in what is known as macromolecular crowding. The space available for the free diffusion of metabolites and other macromolecules is thus greatly reduced, leading to so-called excluded volume effects. The slow diffusion of macromolecules under crowded conditions has been explained using transient complex formation. However, sub-diffusion noted in earlier works is not well characterized, particularly the role played by transient complex formation and excluded volume effects. We have used Brownian dynamics simulations to characterize the diffusion of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 in protein solutions of bovine serum albumin and lysozyme at concentrations ranging from 50 to 300 g/L. The predicted changes in diffusion coefficient as a function of crowder concentration are consistent with NMR experiments. The sub-diffusive behavior observed in the sub-microsecond timescale can be explained in terms of a so-called cage effect, arising from rattling motion in a local molecular cage as a consequence of excluded volume effects. By selectively manipulating the nature of interactions between protein molecules, we determined that excluded volume effects induce sub-diffusive dynamics at sub-microsecond timescales. These findings may help to explain the diffusion-mediated effects of protein crowding on cellular processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.