Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38072865›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2023

Determining rib fracture age from CT scans with a radiomics-based combined model: a multicenter retrospective study.

Yilin Tang, Liang Jin, Wenbin Ji, Zhuangxuan Ma, Dechun Li, Wei Hong, Ming Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Evaluating the age of rib fractures throughInternational journal of legal medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yilin Tang *Radiology Department, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, No. 221 West Yan'an Road, Jing'an District, Shanghai, 200040, China.
Liang Jin *Radiology Department, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, No. 221 West Yan'an Road, Jing'an District, Shanghai, 200040, China. jin_liang@fudan.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7552-7849
Wenbin JiRadiology Department, Shanghai Electric Power Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Zhuangxuan MaRadiology Department, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, No. 221 West Yan'an Road, Jing'an District, Shanghai, 200040, China.
Dechun LiRadiology Department, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, No. 221 West Yan'an Road, Jing'an District, Shanghai, 200040, China.
Wei HongDepartment of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, No. 221 West Yan'an Road, Jing'an District, Shanghai, 200040, China. Drivyh@126.com.
Ming LiRadiology Department, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, No. 221 West Yan'an Road, Jing'an District, Shanghai, 200040, China. ming_li@fudan.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe aimed to develop a combined model based on clinical and radiomic features to classify fracture age.

methodsWe included 1219 rib fractures from 239 patients from our center between March 2016 and September 2022. We created an external dataset using 120 rib fractures from 32 patients from another center between October 2019 and August 2023. According to tasks (fracture age between < 3 and ≥ 3 weeks, 3-12, and > 12 weeks), the internal dataset was randomly divided into training and internal test sets. A radiomic model was built using radiomic features. A combined model was constructed using clinical features and radiomic signatures by multivariate logistic regression, visualized as a nomogram. Internal and external test sets were used to validate model performance.

resultsFor classifying fracture age between < 3 and ≥ 3 weeks, the combined model had higher areas under the curve (AUCs) than the radiomic model in the training set (0.915 vs 0.900, p = 0.009), internal test (0.897 vs 0.854, p < 0.001), and external test sets (0.881 vs 0.811, p = 0.003). For classifying fracture age between 3-12 and > 12 weeks, the combined model had higher AUCs than the radiomic model in the training model (0.848 vs 0.837, p = 0.12) and internal test sets (0.818 vs 0.793, p < 0.003). In the external test set, the AUC of the nomogram-assisted radiologist was 0.966.

conclusionThe combined radiomic and clinical model showed good performance and has the potential to assist in the classification of rib fracture age. This will be beneficial for clinical practice and forensic decision-making. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This study describes the development of a combined radiomic and clinical model with good performance in the classification of the age of rib fractures, with potential clinical and forensic applications. KEY POINTS: • Complex factors make it difficult to determine the age of a fracture. • Our model based on radiomic features performed well in classifying fracture age. • Associating the radiomic features with clinical features improved the model's performance.

Indexed as

Computed tomographyMachine learningRadiomicsRib fracture

Identifiers

PMID38072865
PMCPMC10710975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.