Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38072760›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology oncology2024

Co-occurring BRCA2/SPOP Mutations Predict Exceptional Poly (ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitor Sensitivity in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Jacob J Orme, Fadi Taza, Navonil De Sarkar, Alok K Tewari, Syed Arsalan Naqvi, Irbaz B Riaz, Daniel S Childs, Noha Omar, Nabil Adra, Ryan Ashkar and 27 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European urology oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Molecular insights for the tumor suppressor role of SPOP in prostate cancer.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

37 authors at 19 institutions in 3 countries.

Jacob J OrmeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Fadi TazaDivision of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Navonil De SarkarDepartment of Pathology and Cancer Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Alok K TewariDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Syed Arsalan NaqviDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Irbaz B RiazDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Daniel S ChildsDepartment of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Noha OmarAscension St Agnes Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Nabil AdraDivision of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Ryan AshkarDivision of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Heather H ChengUniversity of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Michael T SchweizerUniversity of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Alexandra O SokolovaOregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR, USA.
Neeraj AgarwalHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Pedro BarataUH Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Oliver SartorDepartment of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Diogo BastosOncology Center, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
Oren SmaletzHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jacob E BerchuckDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Heather McClureDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Mary-Ellen TaplinDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Rahul AggarwalUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Cora N SternbergEnglander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Panagiotis J VlachostergiosEnglander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Ajjai S AlvaUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Niven MehraRadboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Peter S NelsonUniversity of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Justin HwangDivision of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Scott M DehmDivision of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Qian ShiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Zoe FleischmannFoundation Medicine Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Ethan S SokolFoundation Medicine Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Andrew ElliottCaris Life Sciences, Irving, TX, USA.
Haojie HuangDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Alan BryceDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Catherine H MarshallJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Emmanuel S AntonarakisDivision of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Electronic address: anton401@umn.edu.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USHarvard University · USIndiana University School of MedicineUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Washington · USCornell University · USFoundation Medicine (United States)Caris Life Sciences (United States) · USHospital Israelita Albert Einstein · BRHospital Sírio-Libanês · BRJohns Hopkins University · USMedical College of Wisconsin · USOregon Health & Science University · USRadboud University Nijmegen · NLSaint Agnes Hospital · USUniversity Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Translational Bioimaging Core Shared ResourceP30CA015704 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Eric Collisson · 1985 to 2026
$296.4M
Women's CancerP30CA077598 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Timothy C. Hallstrom · 1998 to 2026
$100.4M
TRANSCRIPTOME AND PROTEOME STRATIFICATION OF PROSTATE ADENOCARCINOMA PHENOTYPESP50CA097186 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI PETER S NELSON · 2002 to 2026
$58.1M
AR Gene Rearrangements and AR Signaling in Prostate CancerR01CA174777 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Scott M. Dehm · 2013 to 2026
$4.9M
Targeting early events in prostate cancer lineage plasticityR01CA270539 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Scott M. Dehm · 2023 to 2026
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015704NCI NIH HHS P30 CA077598NCI NIH HHS P50 CA097186NCI NIH HHS R01 CA174777NCI NIH HHS R01 CA270539
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveBRCA2 mutations in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) confer sensitivity to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. However, additional factors predicting PARP inhibitor efficacy in mCRPC are needed. Preclinical studies support a relationship between speckle-type POZ protein (SPOP) inactivation and PARP inhibitor sensitivity. We hypothesized that SPOP mutations may predict enhanced PARP inhibitor response in BRCA2-altered mCRPC.

methodsWe conducted a multicenter retrospective study involving 13 sites. We identified 131 patients with BRCA2-altered mCRPC treated with PARP inhibitors, 14 of which also carried concurrent SPOP mutations. The primary efficacy endpoint was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (≥50% PSA decline). The secondary endpoints were biochemical progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), clinical/radiographic progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). These were compared by multivariable Cox proportional hazard models adjusting for age, tumor stage, baseline PSA level, Gleason sum, prior therapies, BRCA2 alteration types, and co-occurring mutations. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. PSA responses were observed in 60% (70/117) of patients with BRCA2mut/SPOPwt disease and in 86% (12/14) of patients with BRCA2mut/SPOPmut disease (p = 0.06). The median time on PARP inhibitor treatment was 24.0 mo (95% confidence interval [CI] 19.2 mo to not reached) in this group versus 8.0 mo (95% CI 6.1-10.9 mo) in patients with BRCA2 mutation alone (p = 0.05). In an unadjusted analysis, patients with BRCA2mut/SPOPmut disease experienced longer PSA-PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.33 [95% CI 0.15-0.72], p = 0.005) and clinical/radiographic PFS (HR 0.4 [95% CI 0.18-0.86], p = 0.02), and numerically longer OS (HR 0.4 [95% CI 0.15-1.12], p = 0.08). In a multivariable analysis including histology, Gleason sum, prior taxane, prior androgen receptor pathway inhibitor, stage, PSA, BRCA2 alteration characteristics, and other co-mutations, patients with BRCA2mut/SPOPmut disease experienced longer PSA-PFS (HR 0.16 [95% CI 0.05-0.47], adjusted p = 0.001), clinical/radiographic PFS (HR 0.28 [95% CI 0.1-0.81], adjusted p = 0.019), and OS (HR 0.19 [95% CI 0.05-0.69], adjusted p = 0.012). In a separate cohort of patients not treated with a PARP inhibitor, there was no difference in OS between patients with BRCA2mut/SPOPmut versus BRCA2mut/SPOPwt disease (HR 0.97 [95% CI 0.40-2.4], p = 0.94). In a genomic signature analysis, Catalog of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) SBS3 scores predictive of homologous recombination repair (HRR) defects were higher for BRCA2mut/SPOPmut than for BRCA2mut/SPOPwt disease (p = 0.04). This was a retrospective study, and additional prospective validation cohorts are needed. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: In this retrospective analysis, PARP inhibitors appeared more effective in patients with BRCA2mut/SPOPmut than in patients with BRCA2mut/SPOPwt mCRPC. This may be related to an increase in HRR defects in coaltered disease. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this study, we demonstrate that co-alteration of both BRCA2 and SPOP predicts superior clinical outcomes to treatment with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors than BRCA2 alteration without SPOP mutation.

Indexed as

BRCA2 ProteinMutationPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNuclear ProteinsRepressor ProteinsRetrospective StudiesBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanNuclear ProteinsPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsRepressor ProteinsBRCA2 mutationPoly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitorsSPOP mutation

Identifiers

PMID38072760
PMCPMC11162506
OpenAlexW4389504885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.