Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38072324›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2024

Trends in Utilization and Medicare Spending on Short-Course Radiation Therapy for Breast and Prostate Cancer: An Episode-Based Analysis From 2015 to 2019.

Tej A Patel, Bhav Jain, Neha Vapiwala, Fumiko Chino, Kathryn R Tringale, Brandon A Mahal, Kosj Yamoah, Sean N McBride, Miranda B Lam, Anne Hubbard and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Tej A PatelDepartment of Healthcare Management and Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Bhav JainDepartment of Health Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Neha VapiwalaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Fumiko ChinoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Kathryn R TringaleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, San Diego, California.
Brandon A MahalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Kosj YamoahDepartment of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.
Sean N McBrideDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Miranda B LamDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Anne HubbardDepartment of Health Policy, American Society for Radiation Oncology, Arlington, Virgnia.
Paul L NguyenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Edward Christopher DeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. Electronic address: deee1@mskcc.org.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USAmerican Society for Radiation Oncology · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USStanford University · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Biomarker Approaches to Individualizing Systemic Therapy for High Risk Prostate CancerR01CA240582 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FENG, FELIX YI-CHUNG, NGUYEN, PAUL L · 2020 to 2024
$3.4M
Assessing Variation in Outcomes for Cancer Patients Receiving Radiation Treatments and Identifying High-Value Radiation Oncology PracticesK08CA273549 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Miranda Lam · 2023 to 2026
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA273549NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA240582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEvidence supports the value of shorter, similarly efficacious, and potentially more cost-effective hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT) regimens in many clinical scenarios for breast cancer (BC) and prostate cancer (PC). However, practice patterns vary considerably. We used the most recent Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data to assess trends in RT cost and practice patterns among episodes of BC and PC. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of all external beam RT episodes for BC and PC from 2015 to 2019 to assess predictors of short-course RT (SCRT) use and calculated spending differences. Multivariable logistic regression defined adjusted odds ratios of receipt of SCRT over longer-course RT (LCRT) by treatment modality, age, year of diagnosis, type of practice, and the interaction between year and treatment setting. Medicare spending was evaluated using multivariable linear regression controlling for duration of RT regimen (SCRT vs LCRT) in addition to the above covariables.

resultsOf 143,729 BC episodes and 114,214 PC episodes, 63,623 (44.27%) and 25,955 (22.72%) were SCRT regimens, respectively. Median total spending for SCRT regimens among BC episodes was $9418 (interquartile range [IQR], $7966-$10,983) versus $13,602 (IQR, $11,814-$15,499) for LCRT. Among PC episodes, median total spending was $6924 (IQR, $4,509-$12,905) for stereotactic body RT, $18,768 (IQR, $15,421-$20,740) for moderate hypofractionation, and $27,319 (IQR, $25,446-$29,421) for LCRT. On logistic regression, receipt of SCRT was associated with older age among both BC and PC episodes as well as treatment at hospital-affiliated over freestanding sites (P < .001 for all).

conclusionsIn this evaluation of BC and PC RT episodes from 2015 to 2019, we found that shorter-course RT resulted in lower costs than longer-course RT. SCRT was also more common in hospital-affiliated sites. Future research focusing on potential payment incentives encouraging SCRT when clinically appropriate in the 2 most common cancers treated with RT will be valuable as the field continues to prospectively evaluate cost-effective hypofractionation in other disease sites.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsProstatic NeoplasmsAgedHumansMaleMedicareNeoadjuvant TherapyRetrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID38072324
PMCPMC11890213
OpenAlexW4389482591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.