Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38072133›Full record

ReviewExperimental hematology2024

Ex vivo hematopoietic stem cell expansion technologies: recent progress, applications, and open questions.

Grace A Meaker, Adam C Wilkinson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental hematology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Treating genetic blood disorders in the era of CRISPR-mediated genome editing.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  19. Clinical hematopoietic stem cell-based gene therapy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  20. Identifying genetic errors of immunity due to mosaicism.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Grace A MeakerMRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Adam C WilkinsonMRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: adam.wilkinson@imm.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are a rare but potent cell type that support life-long hematopoiesis and stably regenerate the entire blood and immune system following transplantation. HSC transplantation represents a mainstay treatment for various diseases of the blood and immune systems. The ex vivo expansion and manipulation of HSCs therefore represents an important approach to ask biological questions in experimental hematology and to help improve clinical HSC transplantation therapies. However, it has remained challenging to expand transplantable HSCs ex vivo. This review summarizes recent progress in ex vivo HSC expansion technologies and their applications to biological and clinical problems and discusses current questions in the field.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationCell ProliferationHematopoiesisHematopoietic Stem Cells

Identifiers

PMID38072133
PMCPMC11511678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.