ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical sciences2024
An Automated Electroanalytical Method for the Drug Release Profiling of Liposomal Doxorubicin HCl Formulations.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Two-dimensional graphene nanomaterials for combined photothermal and chemotherapy-enhanced targeted therapy of breast cancer.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Liposomes have emerged as a drug delivery system for various chemotherapeutics providing enhanced bioavailability and reduced toxicity. In vitro drug release profiling of liposomal formulations is one of the essential tests for the premarket approval and post market quality control. We developed an automated electroanalytical method for drug release profiling of liposomal doxorubicin formulation. In this electroanalytical method, square wave voltammetry mode was selected to determine the released drug, the only redox-active analyte, by measuring the current at the pulsed potential ranges. Therefore, no separation from liposomal encapsulated doxorubicin is needed. This electroanalytical method provided a continuous drug release measurement for 24 h. The drug release increased as the release media pH and temperature increased. At 37 °C, the drug release increased from 7 % to 40 % when the pH increased from 5.5 to 7.4, In addition, at pH 6.5, as the temperature increased from 37 °C to 52 °C, total drug release increased by more than two-fold. Complete drug release (more than 80 %) was obtained at pH 6.5 and 52 °C in less than 3 h. The brand name and the two generic formulations showed similar drug release profile in all experimental conditions. This method is an alternative to traditional methods which require separation steps such as dialysis or solid phase extraction to quantitate released doxorubicin. This method may be further applied in the in vitro release testing of other liposomal formulations containing redox-active drug substances, e.g., liposomes encapsulating daunorubicin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.