ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2024
Fatal coronary perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention: The medico-legal interest in establishing the correlation between in vivo imaging and post-mortem histopathology.
Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Correlation between in vivo imaging and post‑mortem autopsy findings for the medico-legal evaluation of a right hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm as a fatal complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 64-year-old man diagnosed with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) underwent elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to place a stent in a branch of the first diagonal artery. Fifteen minutes after the procedure, the patient suffered a cardiac arrest, which was subsequently determined to be caused by cardiac tamponade identified through ultrasound examination. Despite an hour of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, the patient died and a forensic investigation was requested by the public prosecutor. On review of the coronary angiography images, an extravasation of contrast was noted, which was classified as a type II perforation according to the Ellis classification. Autopsy revealed a hemorrhagic suffusion area on the anterior surface of the left ventricle with suspected epicardial discontinuity. Histopathological examination confirmed a complete rupture of the vessel wall in the distal section of the branch where the stent was placed, accompanied by adjacent hemorrhagic and fibrin-platelet material. The diagnosis of coronary perforation is typically made through imaging and histological confirmation is rarely obtained. In the present case, the correlation between in vivo imaging and post-mortem histopathology not only facilitated the precise localization of the coronary perforation but also had significant medico-legal implications in the assessment of presumed medical liability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38071677What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.