ArticleJournal of animal science2024
Using deep learning to accurately detect sow vulva size in a group pen with a single camera.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combined Infrared Thermography and Agitated Behavior in Sows Improve Estrus Detection When Applied to Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Sow Estrus Detection Based on the Fusion of Vulvar Visual Features.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- The sow vaginal and gut microbiota associated with longevity and reproductive performance.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents a non-contact method for the detection of changes in sow vulva size in a group pen. The traditional approach to estrus detection is manually pressing down on the back of the sow to elicit standing responses; however, this method causes undue distress for sows not in estrus. When a sow is in estrus, the vulva is red and swollen due to the presence of endocrine. Monitoring changes in vulva size to detect estrus with as little impact on the sow as possible is the focus of this study. This is achieved using a single camera combined with a deep learning framework. Our approach comprises two steps: vulva detection and vulva size conversion. Images of sows of Yorkshire, Landrace, and Duroc breeds were collected in group housing, and the vulva was detected through artificial markers and the network architecture of YOLO v4. Based on the internal and external parameters of the camera, the detected size was converted into millimeters and the results of manual measurement (MM) and automatic calculation combined to calculate the size of the vulva. Analysis of the calculated size compared with MM indicates that the object recognition rate of the system exceeds 97.06%, with a size error of only + 1.70 to -4.47 mm and high-calculation efficiency (>2.8 frames/s). Directions for future research include the automatic detection of pig width.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.