Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38071557›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurointerventional surgery2024

Outcome study of the Pipeline Vantage Embolization Device (second version) in unruptured (and ruptured) aneurysms (PEDVU(R) study).

Thomas C Booth, Ahmed Bassiouny, Jeremy Lynch, Hemant Sonwalkar, Aaron Bleakley, Ahmed Iqbal, Thais Minett, Jonathon Buwanabala, Ana Paula Narata, Tufail Patankar and 12 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurointerventional surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07175519 (Safety and Efficacy of Aneurysms Treated With Endovascular Devices), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07175519 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Safety and Efficacy of Aneurysms Treated With Endovascular Devices

TypeobservationalSponsorKing's College LondonRan2025 to 2035Enrolled5,000ConditionsBrain Aneurysm, Stroke, Intracranial HemorrhagesArmsEndovascular treatment of aneurysms
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Thomas C BoothSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College, London, UK thomas.booth@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0984-3998
Ahmed BassiounySchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5846-7234
Jeremy LynchDepartment of Neuroradiology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1476-0612
Hemant SonwalkarDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4822-7338
Aaron BleakleyDepartment of Neuroradiology, Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2174-4730
Ahmed IqbalQueen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Thais MinettCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3232-9455
Jonathon BuwanabalaCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-2462-6763
Ana Paula NarataDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5658-1439
Tufail PatankarInterventional Neuroradiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3460-1528
Fathallah Ismail IslimDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-1806-8537
Naga KandasamyDepartment of Neuroradiology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Parthiban BalasundaramDepartment of Neuroradiology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3848-2140
Sara SciaccaDepartment of Neuroradiology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Juveria SiddiquiDepartment of Neuroradiology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Daniel WalshDepartment of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Christos ToliasDepartment of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0620-471X
Ahilan Kailaya-VasanDepartment of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6495-2903
Amina A SultanDiagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Mahmoud Abd El-LatifDiagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0459-5481
Alex MortimerNeuroradiology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7744-2833
Anand SastryRadiology Department, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Pipeline Vantage Embolization Device (PEDV) is the fourth-generation pipeline flow diverter for intracranial aneurysm treatment. There are no outcome studies for the second PEDV version. We aimed to evaluate safety and efficacy outcomes. Primary and secondary objectives were to determine outcomes for unruptured and ruptured cohorts, respectively.

methodsIn this multicenter retrospective and prospective study, we analyzed outcome data from eight centers using core laboratory assessments. We determined 30-day and ≥3-month mortality and morbidity rates, and 6- and 18-month radiographic aneurysm occlusion rates for procedures performed during the period July 2021-March 2023.

resultsWe included 121 consecutive patients with 131 aneurysms. The adequate occlusion rate for the unruptured cohort at short-term and medium-term follow up, and also for the ruptured cohort at short-term follow up, was >90%. Two aneurysms (1.5%) underwent retreatment. When mortality attributed to a palliative case in the unruptured cohort, or subarachnoid hemorrhage in the ruptured cohort, was excluded then the overall major adverse event rate in respective cohorts was 7.5% and 23.5%, with 0% mortality rates for each. When all event causes were included on an intention-to-treat basis, the major adverse event rates in respective cohorts were 8.3% and 40.9%, with 0.9% and 22.7% mortality rates.

conclusionsFor unruptured aneurysm treatment, the second PEDV version appears to have a superior efficacy and similar safety profile to previous-generation PEDs. These are acceptable outcomes in this pragmatic and non-industry-sponsored study. Analysis of ruptured aneurysm outcomes is limited by cohort size. Further prospective studies, particularly for ruptured aneurysms, are needed.

Indexed as

Aneurysm, RupturedEmbolization, TherapeuticIntracranial AneurysmAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAneurysmFlow DiverterHemorrhageInterventionSubarachnoid

Identifiers

PMID38071557
PMCPMC11503131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.