Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38071447›Full record

ArticleStem cells translational medicine2024

Expert Revision of Key Elements for Clinical-Grade Production and Qualification of Perinatal Derivatives.

Roberto Gramignoli, Nicola Hofmann, Marta Agudo-Barriuso, Mariastefania Antica, Ana I Flores, Lenart Girandon, Halima Kerdjoudj, Ruta Navakauskiene, Jessica Schiavi, Hanne Scholz and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Roberto GramignoliDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3362-4170
Nicola HofmannGerman Society for Tissue Transplantation (DGFG) gGmbH, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5281-1361
Marta Agudo-BarriusoExperimental Ophthalmology Group, University of Murcia and Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Campus Ciencias de la Salud, Murcia, Spain.
Mariastefania AnticaRuder Boskovic Institute, Division of Molecular Biology, Zagreb, Croatia.
Ana I FloresRegenerative Medicine Group, Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain.
Lenart GirandonEducell Ltd., R&D Department, Trzin, Slowenia.
Halima KerdjoudjUniversity of Reims Champagne Ardenne, EA 4691 BIOS, Reims, France.
Ruta NavakauskieneDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Institute of Biochemistry, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Jessica SchiaviDepartment of Bioprocesses Biomolecules, University of Lorraine, CNRS, LRGP, Nancy, France.
Hanne ScholzDepartment of Transplant Medicine, Department of Cellular Therapy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Volodymyr ShabliiLaboratory of Biosynthesis of Nucleic Acids, Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Department of Functional Genomics, National Academy of Science, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Xavier LafargeEtablissement Français du Sang Nouvelle-Aquitaine, Laboratoire d'ingénierie tissulaire et cellulaire, Bordeaux, France.
Francisco J NicolásLab. Regeneración, Oncología Molecular y TGFß. IMIB-Pascual Parrilla, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain.
Florelle GindrauxCHU Besançon, Service de Chirurgie Maxillo-Faciale, Stomatologie et Odontologie Hospitalière, F-25000 Besançon, France.

Funding

European Cooperation in Science and Technology
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perinatal derivatives have been proposed as adjunct therapeutic strategies or innovative treatments. Undoubtedly, perinatal derivatives can offer the opportunity and source material to isolate multipotent stem cells, but both maternal- and fetal-derived tissues can be processed and transformed into engineered tissues or advanced biomedical devices, whose potential remains to be fully elucidated. Promising preclinical and clinical results collected so far clearly foresee an escalation of such novel treatments. Market forecasts predict exponential growth in such advanced medicinal products during the next decade, with a pragmatic innovation for medicine into a more advanced biomedical version, enlarging the portfolio for treating a wide range of congenital and acute conditions. However, all these promising and fascinating therapeutic possibilities cannot gain a solid and recognized role in established medical practice without rigid and harmonized manufacturing strategies. The implementation of strategies according to guidelines and directives compiled by Regulatory Agencies, in conformity to (European) Pharmacopoeia and for Good Manufacturing Practice -conforming production of such products, represent critical steps required to translate perinatal technologies into effective therapeutic approaches. During the past 5 years, a panel of European experts and developers, gathered under the umbrella of the COST Sprint Action, supported by the European Cooperation in Science and Technology action, had the opportunity to revise and summarize experience and recommendations for a fruitful and proficient generation of perinatal biomedical products. In order to facilitate the creation and potential commercialization of perinatal bioengineered and advanced pharmaceutical products and technologies, such a collection of data and recommendations is described and discussed here.

Indexed as

MedicineTissue EngineeringFemaleHumansPregnancyadvanced medical deviceATMPcell therapyEuropean Regulationperinatal derivativesplacenta

Identifiers

PMID38071447
PMCPMC10785218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.