ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2023
Impact of Internal Carotid Stenosis Treatment on Cerebral Blood Flow Volume: A Comparative Study between Preoperative and Postoperative Values.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Among patients with ICA stenosis, there are some cases with elevated, undisrupted, and diminished cerebral blood flow (CBF). The aim of this study was to assess the influence of ICA stenosis treatment on postoperative CBF changes in relation to preoperative CBF values. MATERIAL AND METHODS We qualified 58 patients ≥65 years old (28 males, 30 females, mean age 71.02±6.34 years) for surgical intervention due to symptomatic ≥70% ICA stenosis. In all patients, a flow volume in all extracranial arteries (internal carotid [ICA], external carotid [ECA], and vertebral arteries [VA]) was measured preoperatively and 2-3 days following the surgery. The CBF values were compared with the ones established for a healthy population of the same age. RESULTS Preoperatively, there were 3 subgroups of patients, comparing to healthy population: with elevated CBF - "significant compensation," with undisrupted CBF - "mild compensation," and with diminished CBF - "no compensation." Postoperatively, a significant CBF increase was observed in patients with preoperative "no" and "mild compensation" - 277.18±154.26 ml/min (P=0.0000001) and 221.56±98.8 ml/min (P=0.0000001). In a "significant compensation" group, there was no flow increase observed (CBF change of 2.57±58.5 ml/min, P=0.954) - a redistribution of flow was observed. CONCLUSIONS In patients with lower preoperative CBF values, surgical treatment caused a significant increase in global cerebral inflow, which was more prominent in patients with the lowest preoperative CBF. In patients with high preoperative CBF, surgical treatment resulted in a flow redistribution, but did not cause a CBF increase. Volumetric flow assessment in DUS can predict hemodynamic benefit from surgery in terms of CBF increase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.