Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38071250›Full record

ArticleSurgery today2024

Effects of communication delay in the dual cockpit remote robotic surgery system.

Yoshiya Takahashi, Kenichi Hakamada, Hajime Morohashi, Yusuke Wakasa, Hiroaki Fujita, Yuma Ebihara, Eiji Oki, Satoshi Hirano, Masaki Mori

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery today, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Experience with hinotoriJournal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yoshiya TakahashiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho Hirosaki, Aomori, Tokyo, 036-8562, Japan.
Kenichi HakamadaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho Hirosaki, Aomori, Tokyo, 036-8562, Japan. hakamada@hirosaki-u.ac.jp.
Hajime MorohashiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho Hirosaki, Aomori, Tokyo, 036-8562, Japan.
Yusuke WakasaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho Hirosaki, Aomori, Tokyo, 036-8562, Japan.
Hiroaki FujitaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho Hirosaki, Aomori, Tokyo, 036-8562, Japan.
Yuma EbiharaCommittee for Promotion of Remote Surgery Implementation, Japan Surgical Society, Tokyo, Japan.
Eiji OkiCommittee for Promotion of Remote Surgery Implementation, Japan Surgical Society, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoshi HiranoCommittee for Promotion of Remote Surgery Implementation, Japan Surgical Society, Tokyo, Japan.
Masaki MoriCommittee for Promotion of Remote Surgery Implementation, Japan Surgical Society, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

Advanced Telemedicine Network Research Project of the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) JP21hs0122001h0002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the impact of dual cockpit telesurgery on proctors and operators, and acceptable levels of processing delay for video compression and restoration.

methodsEight medical advisors and eight trainee surgeons, one highly skilled per group, performed gastrectomy, rectal resection, cholecystectomy, and bleeding tasks on pigs. Using the Medicaroid surgical robot hinotori

resultsNo significant difference was observed in operative times between proctors and operators (proctor: p = 0.247, operator: p = 0.608) nor in switching times to the dual cockpit mode (p = 0.248). For each survey setting, proctors tended to give lower ratings to delays of ≥ 150 ms. No marked difference was observed in the operator evaluations. On the postoperative questionnaires, there were no marked differences in the mSUS or Robot Usability Score between the proctors and operators (mSUS: p = 0.779, Robot Usability Score: p = 0.261).

conclusionTelesurgery using a dual cockpit with hinotori

Indexed as

Robotic Surgical ProceduresSurgeonsAnimalsCholecystectomyCommunicationHumansSwineDual consoleRobotic surgeryTelesurgery

Identifiers

PMID38071250
PMCPMC11026268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.