Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38071221›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

The role of experience in prioritizing hippocampal replay.

Marta Huelin Gorriz, Masahiro Takigawa, Daniel Bendor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A perspective on neuroethology: what the past teaches us about the future of neuroethology.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marta Huelin GorrizInstitute of Behavioural Neuroscience (IBN), University College London (UCL), London, WC1H 0AP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0281-0627
Masahiro TakigawaInstitute of Behavioural Neuroscience (IBN), University College London (UCL), London, WC1H 0AP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0162-9017
Daniel BendorInstitute of Behavioural Neuroscience (IBN), University College London (UCL), London, WC1H 0AP, UK. d.bendor@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6621-793X

Funding

EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) CHIMEHuman Frontier Science Program (HFSP) RGY0067/2016RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/T005475/1RCUK | Medical Research Council (MRC) MR/N013867/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During sleep, recent memories are replayed by the hippocampus, leading to their consolidation, with a higher priority given to salient experiences. To examine the role of replay in the selective strengthening of memories, we recorded large ensembles of hippocampal place cells while male rats ran repeated spatial trajectories on two linear tracks, differing in either their familiarity or number of laps run. We observed that during sleep, the rate of replay events for a given track increased proportionally with the number of spatial trajectories run by the animal. In contrast, the rate of sleep replay events decreased if the animal was more familiar with the track. Furthermore, we find that the cumulative number of awake replay events occurring during behavior, influenced by both the novelty and duration of an experience, predicts which memories are prioritized for sleep replay, providing a more parsimonious neural correlate for the selective strengthening of memories.

Indexed as

MemoryRecognition, PsychologyAnimalsHippocampusMaleRatsSleepWakefulness

Identifiers

PMID38071221
PMCPMC10710481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.