ReviewTechniques in vascular and interventional radiology2023
Advancements and Future Outlook of PET/CT-Guided Interventions.
Review in Techniques in vascular and interventional radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Research progress and trends on PET/CT imaging of pancreatic cancer: a bibliometric analysis.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Spectral Computed Tomography Diagnosis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease with Neodymium-Hyaluronic Acid Nanoparticles.Biomaterials research · 2026Article
- Peutz-Jeghers syndrome in gynecological cancers: bibliometric trends, clinical insights, and future directions.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2025Article
- Recent Breakthroughs in PET-CT Multimodality Imaging: Innovations and Clinical Impact.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Design and proof of concept of a double-panel TOF-PET system.EJNMMI physics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advancements in minimally invasive technology, coupled with imaging breakthroughs, have empowered the field of interventional radiology to achieve unparalleled precision in image-guided diagnosis and treatment while simultaneously reducing periprocedural morbidity. Molecular imaging, which provides valuable physiological and metabolic information alongside anatomical localization, can expand the capabilities of image-guided interventions. Among various molecular imaging techniques, positron emission tomography (PET) stands out for its superior spatial resolution and ability to acquire quantitative data. PET has emerged as a crucial tool for oncologic imaging and plays a pivotal role in both staging and the assessment of treatment responses. Typically used in combination with computed tomography (CT) (PET/CT) and occasionally with magnetic resonance imaging MRI (PET/MRI), PET as a hybrid imaging approach offers enhanced insights into disease progression and response. In recent years, PET has also found its way into image-guided interventions, especially within the rapidly expanding field of interventional oncology. This review aims to explore the current and evolving role of metabolic imaging, specifically PET, in interventional oncology. By delving into the unique advantages and applications of PET in guiding oncological interventions and assessing response, we seek to highlight the increasing significance of this modality in the realm of interventional radiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.