Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38070910›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Exploring the patient experience of remote hypertension management in Scotland during COVID-19: a qualitative study.

Sheona Mchale, Mary Paterson, Alice Pearsons, Lis Neubeck, Iain Atherton, Bruce Guthrie, Brian McKinstry, Janet Hanley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sheona MchaleSchool of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK S.Mchale@napier.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6222-2141
Mary PatersonSchool of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.
Alice PearsonsSchool of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.
Lis NeubeckSchool of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.
Iain AthertonSchool of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.
Bruce GuthrieThe University of Edinburgh Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4191-4880
Brian McKinstryCentre for Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9581-0468
Janet HanleySchool of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1728-0136
Edinburgh Napier University · GBGlasgow Centre for Population Health · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to understand how patients experienced hypertension management, with or without blood pressure (BP) telemonitoring, during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN, METHODS, PARTICIPANTS AND

settingThis qualitative study conducted between April and November 2022 consisted of 43 semistructured telephone interviews (23 men and 20 women) from 6 primary care practices in one area of Scotland.

resultsFrom the views of 25 participants with experience of using the Connect Me telemonitoring service and 18 participants without such experience, 5 themes were developed. These were: (1) navigating access to services. There were challenges to gaining timely and/or in-person access to services and a reluctance to attend clinical settings because participants were aware of their increased risk of contracting the COVID-19 virus. (2) Adapting National Health Service services. All six practices had adapted care provision in response to potential COVID-19 transmission; however, these adaptations disrupted routine management of in-person primary care hypertension, diabetes and/or asthma checks. (3) Telemonitoring feedback. Telemonitoring reduced the need to attend in-person primary care practices and supported access to remote healthcare monitoring and feedback. (4) Self-management. Many non-telemonitoring participants were motivated to use self-management strategies to track their BP using home monitoring equipment. Also, participants were empowered to self-manage lifestyle and hypertension medication. (5) Experience of having COVID-19. Some participants contracting the COVID-19 virus experienced an immediate increase in their BP while a few experienced ongoing increased BP readings.

conclusionsThe COVID-19 pandemic disrupted routine in-person care for patients with hypertension. Both telemonitoring and some non-telemonitoring patients were motivated to self-manage hypertension, including self-adjusting medication; however, only those with access to telemonitoring had increased access to hypertension monitoring and feedback. BP telemonitoring permitted routine care to continue for participants in this study and may offer a service useful in pandemic proofing hypertension healthcare in the future.

Indexed as

COVID-19HypertensionTelemedicineFemaleHumansMalePandemicsPatient Outcome AssessmentScotlandState MedicineBlood PressureHypertensionPatientsPrimary Health CareTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID38070910
PMCPMC10729221
OpenAlexW4389504923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.