Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38070883›Full record

ArticleOpen heart2023

Contemporary use and outcome of Cabrol shunt in type A aortic dissection surgery: insight from China 5A study.

Hong Liu, Bing-Qi Sun, Si-Chong Qian, Ming-Yu Sun, Yong-Feng Shao, Yi Ding, Hui Li, Hong-Jia Zhang

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open heart, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04398992 (Chinese Registry of Additive Anti-inflammatory Action for Aortopathy & Arteriopathy), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 56% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04398992 recruitingnot on this map

Chinese Registry of Additive Anti-inflammatory Action for Aortopathy & Arteriopathy (5A) Protocol: Rationale, Design and Methodology

TypeobservationalSponsorNanjing Medical UniversityRan2016 to 2030Enrolled10,000ConditionsAcute Aortic SyndromeArmsobservation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hong Liu *Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8143-0912
Bing-Qi Sun *Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Tianjin, China.
Si-Chong Qian *Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ming-Yu Sun *Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yong-Feng ShaoDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yi DingDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Hui LiCapital Medical University Affiliated Anzhen Hospital, Chaoyang-qu, Beijing, China 1737356020@qq.com.
Hong-Jia ZhangDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Capital Medical University · CNJiangsu Province Hospital · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCabrol shunt has been introduced for surgical repair of type A aortic dissection (TAAD) without robust evidence supporting its routine preventive use.

methodsAdult patients with TAAD from China 5A study were included if surgically repaired between 2016 and 2022. Primary outcome was operative mortality according to Society of Thoracic Surgeons criterion. Overall, we compared clinical outcomes in patients with and without Cabrol shunt, and subgroup analysis were further examined between Cabrol shunt and outcome among patients with or without root replacement.

results3283 patients were finally identified for analysis, with median age of 51 (IQR 41-59) years, 2389 men, and 2201 treated with Cabrol shunt technique. Cabrol shunt-treated patients were more severely ill before surgery than those without Cabrol shunt. Overall, the rate of operative mortality was 6.6% (146/2201 in Cabrol shunt group and 71/1082 in non-Cabrol shunt group), with no association between Cabrol shunt and operative mortality (OR 1.012 (95% CI 0.754 to 1.357); p=0.938). Stratified by root replacement, Cabrol shunt was associated with similar risk of operative mortality either in patients without root replacement (OR 1.054 (0.747 to 1.487); p=0.764) or in patients with root replacement (OR 1.194 (0.563 to 2.536); p=0.644) (P interaction=0.765). Results were similar in multiple sensitivity analysis.

conclusionCabrol shunt was not associated with either a greatly lowered or an increased risk of operative mortality, regardless of aortic root replacement. Our study did not support the use of Cabrol shunt as a routine preventive strategy in the treatment of TAAD. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04398992.

Indexed as

Aortic DissectionAdultAortaAzidesChinaDeoxyglucoseHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studies1,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-2-azido-2-deoxyglucopyranoseAzidesDeoxyglucoseAneurysm, DissectingAortic AneurysmCardiac Surgical Procedures

Identifiers

PMID38070883
PMCPMC10729034
OpenAlexW4389504980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.